From: Brad Spencer <bspencer@blackberry.com>
To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Unexpected error re-initializing Wintun 0.9.2
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:07:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c6e326e-139c-012b-fb47-95cc85560485@blackberry.com> (raw)
Using Wintun 0.9.2 on Windows 10 Enterprise 1909 x86_64, creating an
adapter (and then deleting it) works fine. And, using the API to move
packets in and out also works fine. But, if we create an adapter, then
delete it, and _then_ try to either open or create again in the same
process, we get an unexpected error. For example:
From `WintunOpenAdapter()`:
```
wintun: NamespaceRuntimeInit: Failed to open private namespace: You were
not connected because a duplicate name exists on the network. If joining
a domain, go to System in Control Panel to change the computer name and
try again. If joining a workgroup, choose another workgroup name. (Code
0x00000034)
wintun: WintunOpenAdapter: Failed to take pool mutex
```
Alternatively, from `WintunCreateAdapter()`:
```
wintun: CreateAdapter: Creating adapter
wintun: NamespaceRuntimeInit: Failed to open private namespace: You were
not connected because a duplicate name exists on the network. If joining
a domain, go to System in Control Panel to change the computer name and
try again. If joining a workgroup, choose another workgroup name. (Code
0x00000034)
wintun: SelectDriver: Failed to take driver installation mutex
```
If we create and destroy, and then start a new process, we can create
and destroy again in that process, but only once. It does not seem to
matter if we create a session on the first adapter before destroying it
or if we actually use it or not to move packets.
We have tried sleeping for 10 seconds (and much longer!) between
iterations and it seems to make no difference.
Are we misusing or misunderstanding the API? Is this a bug?
We have created a small stand-alone program that demonstrates the bug on
a freshly installed Windows 10 Enterprise 1909:
https://github.com/b-spencer/wintun-adapter-error
--
Brad Spencer
next reply other threads:[~2020-12-17 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-17 14:07 Brad Spencer [this message]
2020-12-17 18:05 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-12-17 18:30 ` Brad Spencer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c6e326e-139c-012b-fb47-95cc85560485@blackberry.com \
--to=bspencer@blackberry.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).