From: j0eblack@teknik.io
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: WIreGuard on embedded devices and traffic shaping question.
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:37:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10506714ccc9074c7fca33401c985275@mail.teknik.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9pyHASJVx0ZC1GNLgddgF_Dja7bqRxGoML8hCuWLaPbzg@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you for the reply, Jason.=0A=0AIndeed my email was a bit rushed, af=
ter some tweaking I was able to shape the entire 10.0.0.0/24 range since =
that is what I intend to use.=0A=0AI used again tc and qdisk as in my pre=
vious projects and everything is working flawlessly, the website is open =
for users to add their public keys.=0A=0AThe next couple of days I have s=
ome free time and I will start a short white-up how new people can get WG=
going and eventually configure one of the peers to be a 'exit' point.=0A=
=0AThanks again for the awesome software!=0A=0ARegards,=0AJoe=0A=0AFebrua=
ry 11, 2017 11:20 AM, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:=0A> H=
ey Joe,=0A> =0A> Sorry for the late reply. There was a conference and the=
n a small trip=0A> after, and now I'm catching up on the backlog.=0A> =0A=
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:05 PM, <j0eblack@teknik.io> wrote:=0A> =0A>>=
If anyone is interested in this set-up I can write a short guide how you=
can=0A>> achieve that and other people can point if any mistakes were ma=
de during the=0A>> setup.=0A> =0A> I'd certainly be interested in some so=
rt of blog write-up. The more=0A> documentation and tutorials, the better=
, IMHO.=0A> =0A>> Something that I want to do, and I was not able to find=
information about it=0A>> in the mailing list or the docs on the website=
is, can bandwidth (traffic=0A>> shaping) limits be applied between conne=
cted peers?=0A> =0A> The traffic shaping with WireGuard is the same trafi=
c shaping found in=0A> the rest of the Linux kernel -- the qdisc and tc s=
ubsystem. I think=0A> you can use the usual techniques there for applying=
shaping to the=0A> entire interface or selectively to certain flows.=0A>=
=0A>> I have done this in the past with open-vpn and tc (per IP address =
shaping)=0A>> and I am really curious if this can be done inside WireGuar=
d or not?=0A> =0A> I believe it can be using exactly that idea.=0A> =0A> =
Regards,=0A> Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-27 11:05 j0eblack
2017-02-11 9:20 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-02-13 13:37 ` j0eblack [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10506714ccc9074c7fca33401c985275@mail.teknik.io \
--to=j0eblack@teknik.io \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).