From: reiner otto <augustus_meyer@yahoo.de>
To: neumann@cgws.de, "Kalin KOZHUHAROV" <me.kalin@gmail.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: Need for HW-clock independent timestamps
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 04:57:10 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1324673763.992877.1526187430298@mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324673763.992877.1526187430298.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
Having implemented this solution already, I consider it some type of hack, =
as the standard time sync unfortunately happens very late in the start of t=
he services, after rc.local called. And the sync might take quite some tim=
e.
Which means, I had to "hack" the time sync immediately after WAN up, and t=
o be done in a single shot, before starting WG.
It might be a reasonable workaround, as a standard new option in openwrt, t=
o allow immediate time sync after WAN up, instead of the graceful sync much=
later.
However, as a real RTC is rather cheap, it might be a good idea, in case of=
commercial apps, to ask the supplier of the device to be used for the inc=
lusion of a RTC.
The more requests, the better the chances to find more devices with RTC inc=
luded.
--------------------------------------------
Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <toke@toke.dk> schrieb am So, 13.5.2018:
=20
=20
The analogue for a wireguard deployment would
be to run NTP on the
unsecured links and not
configure the wireguard tunnels until NTP has
synced. This has different security
implications for a VPN than for
dnssec, of
course, but it could be doable.=20
=20
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-13 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1324673763.992877.1526187430298.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2018-05-13 4:57 ` reiner otto [this message]
2018-05-13 12:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-05-11 22:07 WG: " Axel Neumann
2018-05-11 22:45 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2018-05-12 0:05 ` Glen Bojsza
2018-05-12 19:29 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-12 19:41 ` Aaron Jones
2018-05-15 20:21 ` Devan Carpenter
2018-05-15 20:49 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2018-05-16 7:10 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-16 19:32 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-16 20:32 ` Steve Gilberd
2018-05-17 3:40 ` Paul
2018-05-17 5:03 ` Roman Mamedov
2018-05-17 5:53 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-17 7:07 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-17 8:28 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-16 20:35 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2018-05-12 22:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-05-12 23:05 ` Reuben Martin
2018-05-13 6:11 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-13 12:37 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-05-16 7:01 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-16 9:38 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-05-16 11:08 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-16 11:12 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-13 14:21 ` Wang Jian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1324673763.992877.1526187430298@mail.yahoo.com \
--to=augustus_meyer@yahoo.de \
--cc=me.kalin@gmail.com \
--cc=neumann@cgws.de \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).