From: ae <aeforeve@mail.ru>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: "WireGuard mailing list" <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>,
"Roelf Wichertjes" <roelf@roelf.org>
Subject: Re[4]: problem wireguard + ospf + unconnected tunnels
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:26:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499707596.974784933@f511.i.mail.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9rBDRRnQ1z4+OFRrYjB5c+01oDAqxzdipx9TH4exhdg+w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1091 bytes --]
>Понедельник, 10 июля 2017, 22:09 +05:00 от "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>:
>
>On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:06 PM, ae < aeforeve@mail.ru > wrote:
>> yes - work
>Great to hear! This will be a part of the next snapshot.
>
>> + Pair of missing functionality - which I lacked when replacing with wireguard
>>
>> 1) src addr tunnel
>What is this? Can you elaborate on what you mean?
src address tunnel
Not only src port
But also with an address from which the tunnel packets are sent
At a multichromed server - it is possible but inconvenient to operate from where the packets will be sent via the ip mark
>
>> 2) work in only preshared crypto
>WireGuard has a preshared-key mode, but it's in addition to the normal
>EC-based crypto, not instead of. Welcome to the future!
Routing through crypto keys - maybe well - but with dynamic routing - not working at all
Go through to create a crowd of point-point tunnels - and have 2 keys to use
And the question is: how productive will it work when point multipoint, provided that multipoint ~ 10000? And 10,000 + 1 key
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1876 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-03 21:09 ae
2017-07-04 15:55 ` Roelf "rewbycraft" Wichertjes
2017-07-04 17:10 ` Re[2]: " ae
2017-07-07 15:08 ` Roelf "rewbycraft" Wichertjes
2017-07-07 15:47 ` Re[2]: " ae
2017-07-10 0:46 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-07-10 17:06 ` Re[2]: " ae
2017-07-10 17:09 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-07-10 17:26 ` ae [this message]
2017-07-08 14:21 ` Indefinite queuing for unconnected peers (Was: problem wireguard + ospf + unconnected tunnels) Baptiste Jonglez
2017-07-08 18:51 ` Roelf "rewbycraft" Wichertjes
2017-07-10 0:53 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1499707596.974784933@f511.i.mail.ru \
--to=aeforeve@mail.ru \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=roelf@roelf.org \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).