>Понедельник, 10 июля 2017, 22:09 +05:00 от "Jason A. Donenfeld" : > >On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:06 PM, ae < aeforeve@mail.ru > wrote: >> yes - work >Great to hear! This will be a part of the next snapshot. > >> + Pair of missing functionality - which I lacked when replacing with wireguard >> >> 1) src addr tunnel >What is this? Can you elaborate on what you mean? src address tunnel Not only src port But also with an address from which the tunnel packets are sent At a multichromed server - it is possible but inconvenient to operate from where the packets will be sent via the ip mark > >> 2) work in only preshared crypto >WireGuard has a preshared-key mode, but it's in addition to the normal >EC-based crypto, not instead of. Welcome to the future! Routing through crypto keys - maybe well - but with dynamic routing - not working at all Go through to create a crowd of point-point tunnels - and have 2 keys to use And the question is: how productive will it work when point multipoint, provided that multipoint ~ 10000? And 10,000 + 1 key