For what it's worth, I agree with Lonnie that *something* is necessary. That said, I don't feel it makes sense in the context of [Peer- why_would_this_go_here_its_very_strange]. Having it as an attribute of the peer makes sense to me (e.g. "Description=")... the name really IS an attribute of a peer. The question is, is wg(8) the right place to put this? I think so, but only by virtue of the fact that I can't think of anywhere more appropriate to put it. Hope that feedback is worth at least two cents :) -------------------------------------------- Q: Why is this email five sentences or less? A: http://five.sentenc.es On Sat, 9 Dec 2017, at 09:39, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > > On Dec 8, 2017 14:00, "Lonnie Abelbeck" > wrote:>> >> On Dec 8, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld >> wrote:>> >> I suggested "no spaces" since currently all spaces are stripped in >> config_read_line()> > Oh, okay. It's that way mostly out of my own laziness. I wouldn't > object to making that into a real parser though.> _________________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard