For what it's worth, I agree with Lonnie that *something* is necessary.

That said, I don't feel it makes sense in the context of [Peer-why_would_this_go_here_its_very_strange].

Having it as an attribute of the peer makes sense to me (e.g. "Description=")... the name really IS an attribute of a peer.

The question is, is wg(8) the right place to put this?  I think so, but only by virtue of the fact that I can't think of anywhere more appropriate to put it.

Hope that feedback is worth at least two cents  :)

--------------------------------------------
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es



On Sat, 9 Dec 2017, at 09:39, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:


On Dec 8, 2017 14:00, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <lists@lonnie.abelbeck.com> wrote:

On Dec 8, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:

I suggested "no spaces"  since currently all spaces are stripped in config_read_line()

Oh, okay. It's that way mostly out of my own laziness. I wouldn't object to making that into a real parser though.
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard