Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: logcabin@fastmail.net
To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: PostUp/PreUp/PostDown/PreDown Dangerous?
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:55:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1529632535.19086.1416445888.7A63B9D9@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9p6wS7BfWaa-0yHY-+T=ujqWVu_akkc1=XFO_rGAerY7A@mail.gmail.com>

I'm in favor of keeping the features. A competent sysadmin or netadmin should know not to put questionable material on their systems, or at the very least, try it on a test bed where it can't do any damage.

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, at 9:41 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey list,
> 
> wg(8) is the main WireGuard configuration tool. It takes a fairly
> strict set of inputs, and is supposed to perform acceptable input
> validation on them.
> 
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/about/src/tools/man/wg.8
> 
> wg-quick(8), on the other and, is a dinky bash script, that is useful
> for making some common limited use cases a bit easier.
> 
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/about/src/tools/man/wg-quick.8
> 
> wg-quick(8) has the very handy feature of allowing
> PostUp/PostDown/PreUp/PreDown directives, to execute some helpers,
> such as iptables or whatever else you want in a custom setup. These
> have proven very useful to folks. And because these allow arbitrary
> execution anyway, wg-quick(8) doesn't try very hard to do proper input
> validation either.
> 
> I just saw this nice post pointing out a problem in OpenVPN:
> https://medium.com/tenable-techblog/reverse-shell-from-an-openvpn-configuration-file-73fd8b1d38da
> 
> The same thing applies to wg-quick(8) with
> PostUp/PostDown/PreUp/PreDown. The question is how seriously we should
> take the problem presented by this blog post. Namely, you can't trust
> configuration files given to you by outside parties. Maybe you
> shouldn't reconfigure your network without inspecting what those
> reconfigurations are first. However, one could argue that code
> execution is a bit beyond networking config.
> 
> So, the question we need to ask is whether this problem is important
> enough that these useful features should be _removed_? Or if there's a
> way to make them safer? Or if it just doesn't matter that much and we
> shouldn't do anything.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-22  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-22  1:34 Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-22  1:35 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-22  1:41   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-22  1:55     ` logcabin [this message]
2018-06-22  1:56     ` Antonio Quartulli
2018-06-22 10:46       ` Jordan Glover
2018-06-22 10:53         ` Antonio Quartulli
2018-06-22 13:08           ` Jacob Baines
2018-06-22 14:47             ` Andy Dorman
2018-06-22 15:14             ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-06-22 17:11             ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-22  4:01     ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-06-22  5:44     ` Reto Brunner
2018-06-22 14:07     ` Andy Dorman
2018-06-23 19:16       ` Reto Brunner
2018-06-22 19:26     ` Lonnie Abelbeck
2018-06-22 22:13       ` Jordan Glover
2018-06-23  2:36         ` Antonio Quartulli
2018-06-23  7:02           ` Dario Bosch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1529632535.19086.1416445888.7A63B9D9@webmail.messagingengine.com \
    --to=logcabin@fastmail.net \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).