From: Eric Light <eric@ericlight.com>
To: Adrian Sevcenco <adrian.sev@gmail.com>
Cc: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: wg addconf :: AllowedIPs gets deleted with the additions of peers
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 19:44:39 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1529999079.2386846.1420537656.511A8484@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4b972dc-7852-4b43-0015-2963437e1de3@gmail.com>
Hi, Adrian!
The reason you can't have the _same_ AllowedIPs for two different peers is =
because that's what's used to set the routes. How can you set two differen=
t routes for the same destination?
So, because you're trying to set 0.0.0.0/0, there can only ever be one peer=
at the end of that route.
What you need to do is set a more precise range for the AllowedIPs. For ex=
ample, 192.168.100.0/24 and 192.168.101.0/24 (for two hosts on different ne=
tworks), or 192.168.88.200/32 and 192.168.88.201/32 (for two hosts on the s=
ame network).
Then if you want one host that just *everything else* tunnels through, you =
can set a 0.0.0.0/0 - which behaves as your default route.
Hope that helps :)
Eric
--------------------------------------------
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, at 19:34, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> On 06/25/2018 11:37 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote:
> > Adrian Sevcenco <adrian.sev@gmail.com> writes:
> >=20
> >> On 06/25/2018 10:55 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote:
> >>> Adrian Sevcenco <adrian.sev@gmail.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi! It seems that AllowedIPs declaration gets erased when peers are
> >>>> added with addconf
> >>>
> >>> You can't have the same AllowedIPs for two different peers... :)
> >>
> >> Err... so, it's a bug or a feature?
> >=20
> > A feature. The AllowedIPs controls which IP addresses will be routed to
> > that peer. They refer to addresses inside the tunnel. So depending on
> > your setup you'd specify the single IP you assign each peer, or possibly
> > any subnets behind that peer you want routed through the tunnel.
> Then, how can i set a default allow everything for each peer? Should i=20
> make a different tunnel for each peer?
> But given your explanation i still feel that it is a bug that when an=20
> AllowIPs is declared with the addition of a second peer the declaration=20
> from the first peer gets erased ...
> It should be either a global setting per tunnel OR an individual setting=
=20
> per peer (in which case it should stay set)
>=20
> Thank you!!
> Adrian
>=20
> >=20
> >> If it is a feature how can i make server accept whatever ip get the
> >> client(s) in various networks?
> >=20
> > Changing IPs *on the outside* of the tunnel will be accepted
> > automatically. The Endpoint specifier is only the initial address; if a
> > device changes its IP, it'll just keep sending packets from the new IP,
> > and because they are authenticated by the crypto, the other peer will
> > accept them and change its notion of what IP the other peer is
> > reachable at automatically. So as long as only one peer changes its IP
> > at a time, roaming mostly just works :)
> >=20
> > -Toke
> >=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-26 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 19:51 Adrian Sevcenco
2018-06-25 19:55 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-06-25 20:00 ` Adrian Sevcenco
2018-06-25 20:37 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-06-26 7:34 ` Adrian Sevcenco
2018-06-26 7:44 ` Eric Light [this message]
2018-06-26 8:13 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-06-26 10:56 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1529999079.2386846.1420537656.511A8484@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=eric@ericlight.com \
--cc=adrian.sev@gmail.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).