From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: matthias@urlichs.de
Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id e040b0cf
 for <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>; Sun, 6 May 2018 08:59:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from netz.smurf.noris.de (mail.vm.smurf.noris.de
 [IPv6:2001:780:107:8:83::])
 by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 00f3513d
 for <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>; Sun, 6 May 2018 08:59:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 11:00:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <478568f1-c184-01bd-6e2a-db478c98efb8@gmx.net>
References: <73430f93-d7fa-777b-df24-ef4cb0021f0b@gmx.net>
 <CAHmME9q-wmyXw7pyLRK3YLDZxCHgKaPbx2ZJe75Yrnb4BQzwCQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8d2259a4-15cf-d036-7dd8-fb18e8311aac@gmx.net>
 <CAHmME9q3YF87P9u3WXuXPU9nUZtXPWmRS0raw_8p6Gy-CghJdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <493b3bdf-3cf0-5594-dd7e-4b9c8d84e74c@gmx.net>
 <CAKXLc7dZD1Qzx1q1fPPikXPvu+vAgCpKnBBiP_hKSiJOtTbxng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHLp1Y=S0EmJHJ5kKJMJnd=0==QqCGVX4HXrYV62H=Nk+nx96Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1a630d88-d7f8-7437-89a2-786b3da5888c@gmx.net>
 <CAHmME9o4PUH_+DNMC1cWPcRRfDvdeB0k_6bJMgsMMN8JSq51PA@mail.gmail.com>
 <478568f1-c184-01bd-6e2a-db478c98efb8@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Subject: Re: WG interface to ipv4
To: vtol@gmx.net, =?UTF-8?B?0b3SieG2rOG4s+KEoA==?= <vtol@gmx.net>,
 wireguard <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
From: Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de>
Message-ID: <18A71524-E4DF-4129-958C-75062E994AE8@urlichs.de>
List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard <wireguard.lists.zx2c4.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/options/wireguard>,
 <mailto:wireguard-request@lists.zx2c4.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/>
List-Post: <mailto:wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
List-Help: <mailto:wireguard-request@lists.zx2c4.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard>,
 <mailto:wireguard-request@lists.zx2c4.com?subject=subscribe>



Am 6=2E Mai 2018 09:31:16 MESZ schrieb "=D1=BD=D2=89=E1=B6=AC=E1=B8=B3=E2=
=84=A0" <vtol@gmx=2Enet>:
>
>Added/enhanced (network) security is hardly an knob meant to excite,
>not=20
>sure how you reach that conclusion=2E

Please tell us how adding such an option could possibly enhance security, =
given that you can get the same effect with a simple iptables rule=2E
--=20
-- Matthias Urlichs