From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: alex_y_xu@yahoo.ca Received: from nm41.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm41.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.57]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 069262d4 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 17:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 13:43:01 -0400 From: Alex Xu To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com Message-ID: <20160707134301.37496d8f.alex_y_xu@yahoo.ca> In-Reply-To: References: <20160707165840.GG18014@lud.polynome.dn42> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [WireGuard] NAT-T Keepalives List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 19:15:16 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote as excerpted: > On Jul 7, 2016 6:58 PM, "Baptiste Jonglez" > wrote: > > [0 len could be bad] > > 30 seconds? > > I have the same set of speculations and concerns, but it's mostly just > imaginary without real data, as you said. Maybe I'll write into NANOG? See RFC 4787.