From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: bruno@wolff.to Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [98.103.208.27]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with SMTP id ed19f4f6 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:44:39 -0500 From: Bruno Wolff III To: Ivan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lab=E1th?= Message-ID: <20160830154439.GA5923@wolff.to> References: <20160830064454.GA12680@matrix-dream.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed In-Reply-To: <20160830064454.GA12680@matrix-dream.net> Cc: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com Subject: Re: [WireGuard] wg set - unexpected change of routes List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 07:44:54 +0100, Ivan Labáth wrote: > >I think repeating subnets in different peers is most probably >an error and in such circumstances the most useful action would >be to fail and report it as such. Except in some cases it is convenient to use a large network for one peer and carve out a small subnet in another. Having to list a big subnet with a carve out as the sum of smaller networks can be a big pain.