Rust Version

Rust Version

[Sascha Grunert]

Hey WireGuard developers,

I just wanted to know what the current status of the cross platform version o=
f wireguard is and would vote for a Rust implementation.

I am willing to support the development since I have network programming bac=
kground and know Rust.

Further it would be cool to add obfuscation support to the protocol to make i=
t Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) safe.=20

Best regards,
Sascha=

Re: Rust Version

[Michael Gerlach]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 911 bytes --]

Hey Sascha,

correct me if I am wrong - I am wondering what DPI should do with a
crypto-stream and what "obfuscating" could improve at this point?

Best regards,


n3ph

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 06:47:36PM +0100, Sascha Grunert wrote:
> Hey WireGuard developers,
> 
> I just wanted to know what the current status of the cross platform version of wireguard is and would vote for a Rust implementation.
> 
> I am willing to support the development since I have network programming background and know Rust.
> 
> Further it would be cool to add obfuscation support to the protocol to make it Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) safe. 
> 
> Best regards,
> Sascha
> _______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

-- 
Please use PGP - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

Re: Rust Version

[Sascha Grunert]

Hey n3ph,

The DPI could do a simple classification of the stream which could =
others use within network blocking scenarios. The content should be =
safe, but with obfuscation or maybe tor support it would be even =
=E2=80=9EWhisle blower safe=E2=80=9C.

Best regards,
Sascha

> Am 15.02.2017 um 19:25 schrieb Michael Gerlach <n3ph@terminal21.de>:
>=20
> Hey Sascha,
>=20
> correct me if I am wrong - I am wondering what DPI should do with a
> crypto-stream and what "obfuscating" could improve at this point?
>=20
> Best regards,
>=20
>=20
> n3ph
>=20
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 06:47:36PM +0100, Sascha Grunert wrote:
>> Hey WireGuard developers,
>>=20
>> I just wanted to know what the current status of the cross platform =
version of wireguard is and would vote for a Rust implementation.
>>=20
>> I am willing to support the development since I have network =
programming background and know Rust.
>>=20
>> Further it would be cool to add obfuscation support to the protocol =
to make it Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) safe.=20
>>=20
>> Best regards,
>> Sascha
>> _______________________________________________
>> WireGuard mailing list
>> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
>> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
>=20
> --=20
> Please use PGP - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

Re: Rust Version

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 511 bytes --]

On Wed 2017-02-15 13:29:55 -0500, Sascha Grunert wrote:

> The DPI could do a simple classification of the stream which could
> others use within network blocking scenarios. The content should be
> safe, but with obfuscation or maybe tor support it would be even
> „Whisle blower safe“.

Hm, Tor is TCP-only, and WireGuard uses UDP.  These systems aren't going
to mix well.

WireGuard cannot and will not obscure the source or destination
addresses of the packets that flow over it.

   --dkg

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

Re: Rust Version

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

Hey Sascha,

I would be very happy to work with you on the Rust implementation.
Find me on IRC (I'm zx2c4) and we can chat about it.

Regards,
Jason