From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: lazyvirus@gmx.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id ec84ced2 for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 19:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 995838fd for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 19:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from msi.defcon1 ([93.15.31.113]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lj1Cw-1dkduM0cf8-00dFCU for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 21:57:32 +0200 Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 21:57:28 +0200 From: Bzzzz To: WireGuard mailing list Subject: Re: SSH stuck Message-ID: <20170510215728.23275d88@msi.defcon1> In-Reply-To: References: <20170510003254.2f810c1d@msi.defcon1> <196a1f14-d30b-3926-561c-baf3c8c73c58@york.ac.uk> <20170510101013.715986f0@msi.defcon1> <20170510200501.1126bb62@msi.defcon1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 10 May 2017 21:00:33 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Bzzzz wrote: > > Correction: 4 bytes: from 1420 to 1416; done by a PostUp. > > In the next snapshot, if your primary ethernet device has a > non-standard MTU, wg-quick will try to figure it out automatically and > adjust. However, if your end router (adsl modem, for example) is doing > something odd, you'll have to make this adjustment for yourself. Thus, > the next version of wg-quick will have also an MTU= directive. > Hopefully the snapshot will be out somewhat soon. OK, it's noted. > > I've also seen something that wasn't much expected: > > manually changing the MTU from 1418 to 1416 on the server, > > while VPN was on, also changed the IP address of the WG I/F: > > inet addr:0.0.5.136 !(?) > > That's totally bizarre. I'm guessing you just entered the wrong > command at some point. That's not wireguard-related code, anyhow. > > >>> 1416 & 0xff > 136 > >>> 1416 >> 8 > 5 You're right, seems tied to the 4.9 kernel &| the ifconfig program as it does the same weird thing to my eth0 I/F :/ JY