From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: lazyvirus@gmx.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 655d72b5 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 19:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id e2a489b4 for ; Thu, 25 May 2017 19:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 21:28:39 +0200 From: Bzzzz To: Kalin KOZHUHAROV Subject: Re: Can't seem to split tunnel using tables the way I can in OpenVPN Message-ID: <20170525212839.2ec1cd51@msi.defcon1> In-Reply-To: References: <20170525191337.696cd9d5@msi.defcon1> <20170525201141.0d6a67ed@msi.defcon1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 25 May 2017 21:14:26 +0200 Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: Whoops, back in the loop ! (strange behavior of this ML: when you answer to the ML, it answers only to the sender :/) > Hello Jean-Yves, > > I apologize for the misunderstanding, I completely agree with your > advice! There's no need to apologize: this is not sooo grave ;-) I just wasn't sure about the meaning as it could be interpreted any way. > I guess the adding of "LoL" at the end didn't make that clearer, I > just re-read my tweet. > Thinking about it, I was re-editing it quite a few times to make it > fit the length restriction and the end result was not clear, when > taken out of context. "FAIL" for me, sorry. For your penance, you'll recite 3 times the whole 1970 Unix code forward AND backward, then you'll copy the wg-quick man 10 times with a plume and in Gothic ! Jean-Yves