From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: lazyvirus@gmx.com
Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id ba54bbd2
 for <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>;
 Thu, 25 May 2017 19:50:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22])
 by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 29919c76
 for <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>;
 Thu, 25 May 2017 19:50:47 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 22:03:08 +0200
From: Bzzzz <lazyvirus@gmx.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Can't seem to split tunnel using tables the way I can in OpenVPN
Message-ID: <20170525220308.2952f2a0@msi.defcon1>
In-Reply-To: <1495741814.5454.22.camel@infradead.org>
References: <CAL+S5MVFd9Z=70X67E69-XcEq7hO76UT6vmzLGj+0YS8vhfedA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170525191337.696cd9d5@msi.defcon1>
 <CAKXLc7cf-XW=-yeSDPQbDaKhHmKrj3Tb+n_jv4GLUt_k+qg1xg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170525201141.0d6a67ed@msi.defcon1>
 <CAKXLc7cBiMrx=uXtOtujt=wStVjECU2_oc7ptpTuuwRKpo4TJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170525212839.2ec1cd51@msi.defcon1>
 <1495740721.5454.9.camel@infradead.org>
 <20170525214551.4b602d80@msi.defcon1>
 <1495741814.5454.22.camel@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard <wireguard.lists.zx2c4.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/options/wireguard>,
 <mailto:wireguard-request@lists.zx2c4.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/>
List-Post: <mailto:wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
List-Help: <mailto:wireguard-request@lists.zx2c4.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard>,
 <mailto:wireguard-request@lists.zx2c4.com?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, 25 May 2017 20:50:14 +0100
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:

> The list doesn't have the RFC2369 List-Post: header which would allow
> the 'Reply to List' option to work.
> 
> But that's OK because I just explained to you why it's anti-social and
> shouldn't be used anyway.

If I had time to lose, this could for sure leads to a looong (and,
almost as surely, sterile) discussion, as it concerns only your own
opinion and you're twisting arguments to reflect only it.
I've no spare time to toy, so have a nice day/night and bye.

JY