From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: lazyvirus@gmx.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 2e5da4bb for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2017 18:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 6faac76f for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2017 18:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from msi.defcon1 ([93.15.31.113]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5q45-1dTFYf1csr-00xq5R for ; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 21:02:40 +0200 Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 21:02:37 +0200 From: Bzzzz To: WireGuard mailing list Subject: Many users Message-ID: <20170806210237.4dbbed42@msi.defcon1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi mailing-listers, I wonder if any of you have either made a large test or is using WG with a large number of users, each one having his own key. I'm talking about >> 1,000 keys (closer to 10k is better) ? Or at least with a maximum of individual keys. And are there hard/soft limits to this number ? The goal is to be able to revoke access user by user. Thanks in advance & regards. Jean-Yves