From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: lazyvirus@gmx.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5a420ae8 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5015362d for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 21:13:39 +0200 From: Bzzzz To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: Re: Many users Message-ID: <20170807211339.16f84bc1@msi.defcon1> In-Reply-To: References: <20170806210237.4dbbed42@msi.defcon1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 21:05:09 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote: > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld > wrote: > > There's an artificial limitation of 65535 peers per interface. > > I've just increased this to 2^{20}, which is roughly 1 million peers. > > (I can increase it more, should the need arise.) Hmmmmmm, keep on increasing it and we (WGmailinglistusersofzedeaththatkills) will rule the (known) UNIVERSE ! ;-p) Thanks for that, Jay, WG is not entering the 20th dimension. Kidding apart, that is very nice and confirms that no other VPN solution can compete at this time, either in user's number nor speed. Jean-Yves