Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
	Egbert Verhage <egbert@eggiecode.org>,
	Anonymous Anonymous <admin@hda.me>,
	WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Advising in packages to load new module or reboot
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 01:16:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170808231612.GA24254@zx2c4.com> (raw)

Hey guys,

I've noticed that around 60% of emails and IRC messages I get about
WireGuard issues are due to:

1) forgetting to `rmmod wireguard && modprobe wireguard` after updating
2) installing new kernel headers, removing old kernel headers, updating
   wireguard, and then having the module built for the newer kernel and
   forgetting to reboot
3) not having any headers installed

I don't really know the best generic solution for (3), since different
distros and distro-derivatives (armbian,raspian,archlinuxarm,etc) seem
to express these dependencies in different ways, or not at all. But I do
have an idea to pretty easily address (1) and (2). I've just added the
below to the Gentoo ebuild:

+ if [[ $(uname -r) != "${KV_FULL}" ]]; then
+         ewarn
+         ewarn "You have just built WireGuard for kernel ${KV_FULL}, yet the currently running"
+         ewarn "kernel is $(uname -r). If you intend to use this WireGuard module on the currently"
+         ewarn "running machine, you will first need to reboot it into the kernel ${KV_FULL}, for"
+         ewarn "which this module was built."
+         ewarn
+ elif [[ -f /sys/module/wireguard/version ]] && \
+      old="$(< /sys/module/wireguard/version)" && \
+      new="$(modinfo -F version "${ROOT}/lib/modules/${KV_FULL}/net/wireguard.ko" 2>/dev/null)" && \
+      [[ $old != "$new" ]]; then
+         ewarn
+         ewarn "You appear to have just upgraded WireGuard from version v$old to v$new."
+         ewarn "However, the old version is still running on your system. In order to use the"
+         ewarn "new version, you will need to remove the old module and load the new one. As"
+         ewarn "root, you can accomplish this with the following commands:"
+         ewarn
+         ewarn "    # rmmod wireguard"
+         ewarn "    # modprobe wireguard"
+         ewarn
+         ewarn "Do note that doing this will remove current WireGuard interfaces, so you may want"
+         ewarn "to gracefully remove them yourself prior."
+         ewarn
+ fi

There's a bit of Gentoo-specific stuff in there, but the general idea is
that I first check to see if the module is being built for the current
kernel or a different one, and then I check whether an older module is
loaded than the one just built. It might be slightly trickier to
accomplish this with DKMS, but I think still it's possible.

Any thoughts on this pattern?

Jason

             reply	other threads:[~2017-08-08 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-08 23:16 Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2017-08-08 23:27 ` Jonathon Fernyhough
2017-08-08 23:30   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-08-08 23:37     ` Bzzzz
2017-08-08 23:46     ` Jonathon Fernyhough
2017-08-09 11:16 ` Egbert Verhage
2017-08-09 17:05   ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170808231612.GA24254@zx2c4.com \
    --to=jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=admin@hda.me \
    --cc=dkg@fifthhorseman.net \
    --cc=egbert@eggiecode.org \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).