From: Martin Hauke <mardnh@gmx.de>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: Fixing wg-quick's DNS= directive with a hatchet
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:07:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171027100758.ovqslypy4wexa3bw@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9q3g3622k6C+pcvb_EpA9NdedTmmE59vohUR3nF3fyuvg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:22:42PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> The latest proposal for what we're discussing lives here:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/commit/?h=jd/dns-hatchet
>
> > The hatchet proposal sounds fine for a short term solution,
I also like this approach.
> The Debian maintainer of WireGuard has been talking me out of doing
> this. If I don't ship the hatchet, the solution will be:
>
> - Things work fine on
> arch/gentoo/nix/slackware/void/alpine/exherbo/freebsd/netbsd/normallinuxdistros.
> - DNS entries aren't exclusive but otherwise work on debian/ubuntu, if
> the debian resolvconf is installed rather than openresolv.
> - Everything is broken on Fedora (and OpenSUSE?), where there's no
> openresolv or resolvconf of any kind.
SUSE/openSUSE also does not ship resolvconf/openresolvconf so it's also
affected.
> In other words, the situation is split down the traditional lines of
> the linux distro political landscape. Most distros do the sensible
> thing. Debian does something bizarre and different but that is vaguely
> compatible though not entirely. Redhat holds out in favor of
> systemdnetworkmanagerblabla rather than going with the established
> standard.
SUSE has it's own system called netconfig for handling changes to the
name resolution.
https://github.com/openSUSE/sysconfig/blob/master/doc/README.netconfig
https://github.com/openSUSE/sysconfig/blob/master/doc/netconfig.8
For the interface-handling SUSE is using wicked:
https://github.com/openSUSE/wicked
https://doc.opensuse.org/documentation/leap/reference/html/book.opensuse.reference/cha.basicnet.html#sec.basicnet.nameres
https://www.suse.com/documentation/sles-12/book_sle_admin/data/sec_basicnet_manconf.html
The long term solution should be a proper integration into these frameworks.
That's also something on my personal TODO-list since some time :-)
I also have to speak with some SUSE-people since I remember
discussions some of the functions of netconfig should be replaced with
someting else (maybe even systemd).
> So, if I don't ship the hatchet, then I'll leave it to you to handle
> making things not totally fail in Fedora, as they do now. Is this
> okay? You could choose to fix this by just shipping the hatchet patch
> yourself. Or you could try to integrate things a bit deeper with
> whatever networkmanagersystemdresolveddhclientscript situation is
> being used there. (Probably the hatchet is a bit easier though.) What
> would you think of doing that?
Shipping the hatchet will give the affected distributions some time
for a proper distro-specific integration.
best regards,
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-27 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-25 22:43 Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-25 23:37 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2017-10-26 0:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-26 1:32 ` [PATCH] wg-quick: use bind mount for DNS when no openresolv Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-26 1:53 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2017-10-26 1:54 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-26 13:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-26 2:54 ` Fixing wg-quick's DNS= directive with a hatchet Eric Light
2017-10-26 3:21 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-26 13:11 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-26 16:56 ` Joe Doss
2017-10-26 17:24 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-26 21:22 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-27 10:07 ` Martin Hauke [this message]
2017-10-27 13:22 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-27 14:47 ` Joe Doss
2017-10-27 14:51 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-27 15:02 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-27 15:38 ` Joe Doss
2017-10-27 22:04 ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-10-27 15:38 ` Joe Doss
2017-10-27 17:15 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-27 17:52 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-27 22:06 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017-10-28 2:24 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-28 2:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-28 14:35 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017-10-28 17:57 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-29 12:21 ` Geo Kozey
2017-10-29 17:07 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-30 11:58 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017-10-30 12:10 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017-10-29 22:06 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-30 12:16 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017-10-31 10:49 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-26 19:58 Geo Kozey
2017-10-26 21:11 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-26 22:01 ` Geo Kozey
2017-10-26 22:19 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-26 22:52 ` Geo Kozey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171027100758.ovqslypy4wexa3bw@gmx.de \
--to=mardnh@gmx.de \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).