From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: aranea@aixah.de Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id cb74b533 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 02:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.133.29]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id c6bf629a for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 02:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 03:53:52 +0100 From: Luis Ressel To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com Subject: Re: Standardized IPv6 ULA from PublicKey Message-ID: <20171205035352.01ffe1f5@vega.skynet.aixah.de> In-Reply-To: <372AE79B-69E5-4B18-926C-E402FDFB2E95@lonnie.abelbeck.com> References: <372AE79B-69E5-4B18-926C-E402FDFB2E95@lonnie.abelbeck.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:52:28 -0600 Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone thought about a standardized WireGuard IPv6 ULA generated > from the PublicKey ? This was indeed already discussed, albeit not for ULAs, but link-local addresses (fe80::/64). IIRC, Jason rejected it citing the KISS principle -- and I fully agree with that. Adding a hundred small features useful for certain corner cases is a sure way to transform wireguard into a behemoth of ipsec/openvpn dimensions. :) Cheers, Luis Ressel