From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: baptiste@bitsofnetworks.org Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 56895c4a for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.bitsofnetworks.org (rezine.polyno.me [193.33.56.138]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id e8100e6a for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 08:35:01 +0100 From: Baptiste Jonglez To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: Re: Memleak with 0.0.20171221-5 on Debian stretch Message-ID: <20180212073501.GA5305@tuxmachine.localdomain> References: <20180211134837.GC12558@lud.localdomain> <87r2prs80x.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <20180211184312.GD12558@lud.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" In-Reply-To: Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jason, On 12-02-18, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Secondly, I'm wondering if you tend to do, "anything strange". For > example -- are you setting up and taking down the device often in an > automated way? Or reconfiguring the interface (via wg(8), for example) > often in an automated way? Or is the sustained day-in-day-out workload > that leads to this graph simply forwarding and encrypting/decrypting > packets as usual? If it's the latter, does this device tend to encrypt > or decrypt more, or both equally? It's the latter "day-in-day-out" option: the system has a single wireguard interface, which is configured once at boot-time, and then used extensively to forward traffic. It tends to encrypt more than it decrypts. > In either case, I'm not sure too much has changed between those version > spans you gave, with regards to the general packet encryption/decryption > path, so I suspect this bug will take some hunting to track down. >=20 > Thanks again for the report. Let me know about the kernel version situati= on. --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEjVflzZuxNlVFbt5QvgHsIqBOLkYFAlqBQ5sACgkQvgHsIqBO LkYIPxAAnobYkpxi4D+u2/6dB9uOqiF7zph2rAyHDYwDZWiA8wi30k9zLeI4puHb EzDSMJMNMIHyfd1s8EYpYpA/zgxfWNN46Qq4lVH4orF2OaukKpM8VBbZUL2fTyeS bvDNRuUzT4Bui/mctiELHcaQn9aALClu5V5LIa+BolBP0BDoWIZGl0GJ0IhrGeST 29T7tSyt8AXf8NiAuhfMCO4EdUvTDhWVntDZ63dDwR5xQmMQylWE3yzOQjtsGnQw fd8GXrhg2sV1u0GUZyI7SJeajRUIqn7x3ZcRTHuAlFn0exoBm2tBJKpVZ4YI3Prq zMwFWrj5Gbvlwb7MD5c1S+CE5MX9dqQyX/bFQ5ElEwcIEY3fQrKy9i/UHz/e6u4/ CAmMQ184UB6a5lOWydeWB6t54m1PiNPzC1d9XUPMN35cMXoHA/VlLpj+i7mpUXjC 8kaCCcF3+FSvGc94GDmeh6tuM8AVZVJKe/wMZuqIXzpS5b2Xj/Kx+DxkOJzRtRXA Q4KI2MwJf+6vtoO2IkpXJ34c/jXvtbxCXuEg4Xl94S7WGb3tOnPA2cvzkj50aHGm jzM7q0goZG1oO0rxGmaA1avao5Ky2adflqGkKSq1y+cIRciX6OMpQLYSN+Uj2xmM dsj0fMvdj63HLZbaVvapBhdiZjIej1r3l9BXJMz1I/Fcjm1rGXU= =R/l3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf--