From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Luis Ressel <aranea@aixah.de>,
WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>,
Roman Mamedov <rm.wg@romanrm.net>
Subject: Re: Mixed MTU hosts on a network
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 20:20:29 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180414202029.5f247fba@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9ra=DZiaUS7pP3xAxC_7H-yqfiTefU3Q8gufpP7e6H2zw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 16:45:32 +0200
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
> In this case, WireGuard seems to be doing the right thing. Think you
> could come up with some minimal test that exhibits the behavior you're
> seeing?
I now remember in more detail what was the problem. It was not with MTU 1412
on both sides, it was during trying to mix WG MTU 1412 on the PPPoE-connected
machine, with WG MTU 1420 on the other side (which uses full 1500 underlying
MTU).
Here I posted about it with some tcpdumps included:
https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2018-March/002537.html
With 1420 on the "full MTU" side, the "PPPoE" side had to set 1408 WG MTU for
things to work properly, not 1412 as would theoretically fit into its PPPoE.
I'll post an update if I come up with a short and simple reproducer sequence.
Setting 1412 on both sides seems to work fine from more testing just now.
--
With respect,
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-14 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-16 9:25 Roman Mamedov
2018-03-16 9:35 ` Matthias Ordner
2018-03-16 10:53 ` Roman Mamedov
2018-03-16 16:20 ` Roman Mamedov
2018-03-16 10:01 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2018-03-26 19:12 ` Luis Ressel
2018-04-14 1:38 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-04-14 2:40 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-04-14 13:16 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-04-14 13:40 ` Roman Mamedov
2018-04-14 14:15 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-04-14 14:38 ` Roman Mamedov
2018-04-14 14:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-04-14 15:20 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2018-04-14 23:08 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180414202029.5f247fba@natsu \
--to=rm@romanrm.net \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=aranea@aixah.de \
--cc=rm.wg@romanrm.net \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).