Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] global: the _bh variety of rcu helpers have been unified
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 11:11:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190316161111.GA6435@wolff.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190315051439.19361-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 23:14:39 -0600,
  "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
>---
>Hey Bruno,
>
>Based on your research, how does the below strike you? It's certainly
>not pretty, but I'm struggling to come up with a better solution.

I think anything that doesn't try to keep the _bh versions around is going to 
be ugly. But keeping the _bh versions is not going to be acceptible upstream, 
so that doesn't seem to be an option. What you did looks pretty good 
given the constraints.

In the talk I saw, the motivation for the change was that mismatching 
rcu functions caused security issues, though I don't know how practical 
it is to exploit those mistakes. So I worry a bit about breaking things 
in old kernels accidentally, in the future. I don't have any good ideas for 
automatically catching misuse in new code.

I did try the version you committed, yesterday, and it seemed to work 
fine on a 5.1 kernel.
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

      reply	other threads:[~2019-03-16 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-14  5:16 [PATCH] Merge two rcu types Bruno Wolff III
2019-03-14 12:32 ` Bruno Wolff III
2019-03-14 17:10   ` Bruno Wolff III
2019-03-14 18:58     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2019-03-14 20:05       ` Bruno Wolff III
2019-03-15  5:14         ` [PATCH] global: the _bh variety of rcu helpers have been unified Jason A. Donenfeld
2019-03-16 16:11           ` Bruno Wolff III [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190316161111.GA6435@wolff.to \
    --to=bruno@wolff.to \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).