From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696B2C33CB2 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 034D820702 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="dLloQdRr" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 034D820702 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id cd0eff7b; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id ce757fc5 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com (mail-pg1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id f8574190 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id k3so8750994pgc.3 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:23:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Zw2QOXTYa4DPfoFWBlgmT0QVWsY+VSIRNslcmp73E4U=; b=dLloQdRrHAzD9N+RT3r+t+VeVn1ngk7JOdmn4PXhf9VBwZ5aqozvIWUq0QzaSf+6w2 49nN1Nl1bC6myj8/VRFvqtknJXFC9Bw8rZ4pXwBXjGnfRpIzQFHeStnGX84YaP8wOvmm 43IkND/A1PK9AndEw8xUfQVnteZ6/CiuAS9Zp3HIfBa0iwSTA2Zcw41EkjM1x1caTvU4 gr9y9Rx/QoQmf0wCJBBaklKAwEtYIHWh7+UKTlnASItW7O9w4r/9nCWX/K+P3Bs/1mv5 S9YKrAUWrzS4p3Q0DyrxvV2iSdNIGY8XoA67arpfYzNPZabxza5uhPQmzGj85/yl6EvV VOOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Zw2QOXTYa4DPfoFWBlgmT0QVWsY+VSIRNslcmp73E4U=; b=cCQQwP1+vo7gKOv2dqjQm+55t7aH3IkvjTFATUxQQ5EIf4F00qcehf6hepg6aunqaF xj5TLursnSa+m+SwSOmnFYrkiVyE6or9jDPZ2yuuZF/8BRiGlXCzbJOQO29zMI5iJHIQ x8gVmW6KwuZZCI/cqID5KAHviYYfmBm2dTcpsZtRcFAIGSSKVasXA/4uAlISTsnmgVNH OaThabMrOZ8wG72dTuRhjL8vbKS1RI/caAjLBcFIgn5wl2gW4lI3d7bzYkImWn/E69V7 7qg0EDGetyURYHUSS6KA9jser+dAOWv5I+AwaXtAHulssefLoLxSB1GN0XaPSYc2KFkF XO6A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsY38CYKGnM7XyuikojxesZ8zpCDgFu83j6DfgEYpX/VklEbcK OpkFk4QIs29EKlB0aDWFcpGAJV2U X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxsajtGXiWfJo7puAJC96Gh1QHON9TNgislJuPYpCDA2oHS69K5SxciFe4TldTfyBS2XnF8Mg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:f403:: with SMTP id g3mr30619483pgi.62.1580300594266; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:23:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from Gentoo ([103.231.91.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r145sm2749967pfr.5.2020.01.29.04.23.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:23:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:53:01 +0530 From: Bhaskar Chowdhury To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: Re: wireguard ci hooked up to quite a few kernel trees Message-ID: <20200129122259.GA25949@Gentoo> Mail-Followup-To: Bhaskar Chowdhury , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , WireGuard mailing list , LKML , Netdev , Linux Next Mailing List References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:27:00 +0100 Cc: Netdev , Linux Next Mailing List , LKML , WireGuard mailing list X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5075603074328937134==" Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" --===============5075603074328937134== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Looks bloody good Jason! thanks, man! ~Bhaskar On 13:15 Wed 29 Jan 2020, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >Hi all, > >With the merging of wireguard, I've hooked the project's CI up to >quite a few trees. We now have: > >- net-next >- net >- linux-next >- linux (Linus' tree) >- wireguard-linux (my tree) >- wireguard-linux-compat (backports to kernels 3.10 - 5.5) > >When the various pushes and pulls click a few more cranks through the >machinery, I'll probably add crypto and cryptodev, and eventually >Greg's stable trees. If anybody has suggestions on other relevant >trees that might help catch bugs as early as possible, I'm all ears. > >Right now builds are kicked off for every single commit made to each >one of these trees, on x86_64, i686, aarch64, aarch64_be, arm, armeb, >mips64, mips64el, mips, mipsel, powerpc64le, powerpc, and m68k. For >each of these, a fresh kernel and miniature userland containing the >test suite is built from source, and then booted in qemu. > >Even though the CI at the moment is focused on the wireguard test >suite, it has a habit of finding lots of bugs and regressions in other >weird places. For example, linux-next is failing at the moment on a >few archs. > >I run this locally every day all day while developing kernel things >too. It's one command to test a full kernel for whatever thing I'm >working on, and this winds up saving a lot of time in development and >lets me debug things with printk in the dumbest ways possible while >still being productive and efficient. > >You can view the current build status here: >https://www.wireguard.com/build-status/ > >This sort of CI is another take on the kernel CI problem; I know a few >organizations are doing similar things. I'd be happy to eventually >expand this into something more general, should there be sufficient >interest -- probably initially on networking stuff -- or it might turn >out that this simply inspires something else that is more general and >robust, which is fine too. Either way, here's my contribution to the >modicum of kernel CI things happening. > >Regards, >Jason --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEnwF+nWawchZUPOuwsjqdtxFLKRUFAl4xeR8ACgkQsjqdtxFL KRX0iQf/TkKseJ2jksqjmC+bnMd9mnIox1pWzGwElpv1csKIwul3m+TnHGRFSCOu FBbHlw0MSrrEB0dOyG5NJr2GqtGiEJ1ogoLT6XjUq4qpcaIljJU3gU35c6UKiM12 ThYstC9ZfdXoPgPI5n5qL3p8rTp71Aj7b947ZRfQ2SEMQiEZ5wEgwAwK+fV0yAsa VwqJxZy2jZTiOABqW8Ez65YyhceUDvGfv0G1K6EdZdyWfHsoOHXUH24C4jdtGFWi m+I7ZnFM9LFlzz1Fyh62PDwIBMYHegW3rvm6q3XawJo4+8VYodApw5axbRDfjGFK tMcQCZyCSD4Rtpv+Vrfg0Toveq4nOw== =cnyd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI-- --===============5075603074328937134== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard --===============5075603074328937134==--