Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Ressel <aranea@aixah.de>
To: Torsten Krah <krah.tm@gmail.com>
Cc: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: Endpoint address dns resolution - option to prefer IPv6 or IPv4
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:52:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200314165228.jxydplbghnri2ktm@vega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <327df26ff0e515425bc0b18084117b7ae065d97b.camel@gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 03:52:19PM +0100, Torsten Krah wrote:
> I've got an endpoint with a DNS name which has both, an A and AAAA
> record.
> I would like to configure the client, so that I can tell him, to either
> prefer IPv6 or IPv4 for the vpn connection.

The relevant source code can be found here:
https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-tools/tree/src/config.c#n242

As you can see, wg resolves host names through the libc's getaddrinfo()
function, and simply uses the first ip address returned by that
function.

A standards-compliant implementation should return an ipv6 address in
the first position if one is available and the host has a working
connection to the v6 internet. As far as I know, both glibc and musl do
this (though the behaviour of glibc can be modified by editing
/etc/gai.conf); I'm not sure what other libcs do.

It would of course be possible to make this behaviour configurable for
wg; we just need to figure out if that's an useful feature, and what the
exact semantics should be.

Cheers,
Luis

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-14 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-13 14:52 Torsten Krah
2020-03-14  7:40 ` Stefan Tatschner
2020-03-14 14:53   ` Torsten Krah
     [not found] ` <CAADpXXY7ajNwRoF1sivACxUfFj-SpWf6o6+1Uq2N0XzEp3bvTw@mail.gmail.com>
2020-03-14 14:51   ` Torsten Krah
2020-03-16  5:05     ` Roman Mamedov
2020-03-16  8:30       ` Torsten Krah
2020-03-14 16:52 ` Luis Ressel [this message]
2020-03-14 17:08   ` Matthias Urlichs
2020-03-14 18:03     ` Luis Ressel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200314165228.jxydplbghnri2ktm@vega \
    --to=aranea@aixah.de \
    --cc=krah.tm@gmail.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).