From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D354FC38A2C for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E643F20857 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ajs124.de header.i=@ajs124.de header.b="zFCsbKNq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E643F20857 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ajs124.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 0737862b; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.helsinki.tools (mx1.helsinki.tools [2a01:4f8:c010:4014::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id d21080a4 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:52:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ajs124.de; s=20191020-hss; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=U68IPYmsx8WxXGt8V4T0goqEMBGI4q7+zWpbfj6D9w4=; b=zFCsbKNqMqpvV9cxM9fJoEM1wv ynfstG2EQwJw1O2k01AWbbPy4EjwISJDoDAlByCc0PdMj3V1n4eRDAOPa+9sYnKG1dhxJ2Px6IxQK gvp4D40eub9NeNxXwlOJ+dCgRGJMvG31jtC8W/7Tp96NSOOB4uRBxbw1PP9dJLfN9F7Ycyxejj9vx MiygxziJA2/P+sNgZGkjV9Yud3vWD95TB5dtMzcxmRUbnZQ8uO3gbmBT9d3bk62b69qJBeod4n/hL GQfCzGabGJO5+mQ4u0cGGZgveTgL/dtScTn1yOZKMbgtnfQhgKzlGs3xCxwdFjfjsrDdEgxgbTOnG 5saPyhZQ==; Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:02:41 +0200 From: ajs124 To: Cc: Subject: Re: Is there a way to use wireguard as a non-encrypted VPN? Message-ID: <20200414170241.2d9d5d6d@desk> In-Reply-To: <9a3401d61035$4d6b5840$e84208c0$@pmfarmwald.com> References: <9a3401d61035$4d6b5840$e84208c0$@pmfarmwald.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:13:36 -0700 wrote: > I have some older routers that run OpenWRT just fine, but are a bit slow = at > Wireguard (3-5 MBytes/s for SMB transfers) and which are too slow for > playing HD movies. > For these routers/uses I don't care about security, I just want a VPN to > tunnel (thru Comcast, and other ISPs that block lots of ports.) > If there was a way to use Wiireguard=C2=A0with encryption disabled, I'm p= retty > sure my performance would be closer to 20-50 MB/s which would be more than > adequate. > Thanks. > Mike Farmwald >=20 If you're actually just looking for an unencrypted tunnel, there is some st= andardized stuff like GRE[1] or IP in IP[2] out there. The Linux Kernel supports both of those natively and it looks to me like Op= enWRT should be able to configure at least one of them through its interfac= e. 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_Routing_Encapsulation 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_in_IP