From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15E8C433E0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B07A20874 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:31:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4B07A20874 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=romanrm.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id d9258ea6; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rin.romanrm.net (rin.romanrm.net [51.158.148.128]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id cc95c7a1 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from natsu (unknown [IPv6:fd39::e99e:8f1b:cfc9:ccb8]) by rin.romanrm.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 36F8A4A4; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:31:18 +0500 From: Roman Mamedov To: Toke =?UTF-8?B?SMO4aWxhbmQtSsO4cmdlbnNlbg==?= Cc: Reid Rankin , ch@ntrv.dk, WireGuard mailing list Subject: Re: Standardized IPv6 ULA from PublicKey Message-ID: <20200629153118.4d72f447@natsu> In-Reply-To: <875zbai32e.fsf@toke.dk> References: <372AE79B-69E5-4B18-926C-E402FDFB2E95@lonnie.abelbeck.com> <20171205035352.01ffe1f5@vega.skynet.aixah.de> <20200624153706.3yngzzslepqh7q54@ws.flokli.de> <875zbai32e.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:22:49 +0200 Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Reid Rankin writes: >=20 > > Each IPv6 network device is *required* to have a link-local > > address by the RFC >=20 > Given this What you quoted is the shakiest statement of the entire proposal. Might be a cool idea and all, but I don't think RFCs say anything about "requiring" th= at for point-to-point L3 interfaces, where there's no functioning multicast or broadcast to begin with. And it doesn't seem nice that submitter is trying = to skew facts in their favor like that. --=20 With respect, Roman