From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A252C433E0 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2785221E7 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:33:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C2785221E7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=labrat.space Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 48405ed3; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mariecurie.labrat.space (mariecurie.labrat.space [116.203.185.229]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id bae310f6 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from labrat.space (adsl-178-38-56-54.adslplus.ch [178.38.56.54]) by mariecurie.labrat.space (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7CDF157835A; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 11:31:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=labrat.space; s=201904; t=1608978679; bh=97uyjgmSOPuLT9Y7Cs+AiYLazyH3kblBNVWdbKG/bAM=; l=467; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:To:CC:Date: Subject:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:Reply-To:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Message-ID:References; b=mmWeKqJmdsC4eIUC6cy9cJWJBs41XnLu5gJ/hDdmEMBElofzp6fDrvAGpQsIHxIWa NthQ4J2a28saM1xKiD77UL/MKkSDga64qm2pOC/m03re7/s/E7theNOtS0fw7eQx7F ciPBeYxQjq50pzDwxpSYJFvwymxDHF854zO3zx3EX/g6/eI80GvX1pBFzSzxlTYMcB S8H+SpKPLhflEZU4eCPf2tdTSWcLyUENjNdqafukiTLKrTmYUKnGoYZZIVtX2MNknp zeLkvgvD7VEhKidNh7+D2t6iLbpLuVKbj5q+5nIBhcKVt1oVRSOrK3M0aYUAwx8H+u sDZigvQAjYe1w== Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 11:32:02 +0100 From: Reto To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Rachel Kroll , WireGuard mailing list Subject: Re: "Wireguard [sic]: great protocol, but skip the Mac app" blog post Message-ID: <20201226103202.q2netyh65ymfmbel@feather.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Rachel Kroll , WireGuard mailing list References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi Jason, Please don't let blog posts like this get to you. Following this list, as well as the IRC channel, it's very clear that you care and go over great pains to make wireguard useful to all. Rest assured that a lot of people, including me, are very grateful for all that you do and for your nice work all over the place in the kernel. I don't write blog posts that trend on hacker news I'm afraid... So this email has to do ;) Kind regards, Reto