From: Chris Osicki <wg@osk.ch>
To: Henning Reich <henning.reich@gmail.com>
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: WG default routing
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:15:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210105201524.GB31054@server> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOAVeL3EodpJ9YS5TsPgq0vPhCGX-W1eueASTV+SPZ9NJA0TKQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 02:38:23PM +0100, Henning Reich wrote:
> Hi,
> you can control the traffic is routed with the AllowedIPs option. If
> you use 0.0.0.0/0, all traffic is routed through the wireguard tunnel.
> If you just allow for example 10.10.10.10/32 only 10.10.10.10 is
> allowed. 10.10.0.0/16,192.168.1.0/24 will allow
> 10.10.0.0-10.10.254.254 and 192.168.1.0-192.168.1.254 and so on...
>
> I use
> [Peer]
> PublicKey = xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> AllowedIPs = 172.16.16.0/24,10.10.0.0/16,10.0.0.0/16
> Endpoint = 123.123.123.123:12346
> PersistentKeepalive=30
>
> Am Mo., 4. Jan. 2021 um 13:40 Uhr schrieb Chris Osicki <wg@osk.ch>:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I am quite new to wireguard, moving after years of OpenVPN, and found it simple and _really good_.
> > One thing, however, makes me wonder. Why WG tries always to take over all my routing?
> > My first try was with wg-quick, and noticed all my traffic went through the WG-VPN connection.
> > It escapes me why. What is the idea behind this policy?
> >
> > On my Linux boxes it's not a problem, I don't have to use wg-quick and with few lines of bash in a script I have what I need. I have root.
> > On my Android devices I don't have root, and I cannot change anything in routing etc.
> > Why don't you provide an option to specify which net to route which way?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chris
Hi,
As I wrote in another mail, AllowedIPs config file option has nothing to do with routing, IMHO.
It looks just like a filter.
Regards,
Chris
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-05 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-03 21:54 Chris Osicki
2021-01-04 13:22 ` Gijs Conijn
2021-01-05 20:12 ` Chris Osicki
2021-01-05 20:25 ` Roman Mamedov
2021-01-05 21:13 ` Chris Osicki
2021-01-05 23:50 ` Phillip McMahon
2021-01-06 1:03 ` Corey Costello
2021-01-06 1:17 ` Samuel Holland
2021-01-04 13:38 ` Henning Reich
2021-01-05 20:15 ` Chris Osicki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210105201524.GB31054@server \
--to=wg@osk.ch \
--cc=henning.reich@gmail.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).