From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A84C433E0 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97FBE65111 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:24:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 97FBE65111 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=chocolatine.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 9da78c1b; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.chocolatine.org (mx.chocolatine.org [137.220.37.30]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id e73c94a5 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86198 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Mar 2021 18:24:30 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:24:30 +0000 From: Nicolai To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com Subject: Re: Removing WireGuard Support From FreeBSD Base Message-ID: <20210316182430.GA42183@chocolatine.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:37:59AM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Here's the technical background you asked for: > - We found tons of issues with the original code base. > - We spent a week rewriting that codebase. > So here's the rationale: > - Merging a week-old codebase into an operating system kernel is a bad idea. Yeah, when I saw the recent sudden work to get WireGuard into FreeBSD 13, I was excited but also nervous since it's been in beta/RC for a while, just a bit late to introduce important features. I think the current plan is sensible and will produce a result everyone likes. > We probably can even offer prebuilts at some point for people who want > to test out snapshots. That's a great idea! WireGuard is what finally got me to run OpenBSD-current, so I could test the snaps. Nicolai