Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
Cc: Nico Schottelius <nico.schottelius@ungleich.ch>,
	el3xyz <el3xyz@protonmail.com>,
	wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: WireGuard with obfuscation support
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:21:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210927102157.GA23755@wolff.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210927143628.36c2ceab@nvm>

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 14:36:28 +0500,
  Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 04:14:35 -0500
>Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> wrote:
>
>> This isn't a simple problem. The assumption is that someone is seeing
>> your network traffic and blocking it.
>
>The assumption is that there's an appliance at the ISP which has a DROP rule
>for UDP with 4 fixed bytes at a fixed offset. It has five hundreds other rules
>to process as well, so it can't spend "too much" time on specifically WG.
>
>> They are still going to see it  even if you disguise it.
>
>With obfuscation there would be UDP packets of random junk, and it would be a
>much harder job to come up with a rule to drop those without affecting
>anything else.

If your ISP is blocking your Wireguard traffic call them up and complain.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-27 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-26 12:09 el3xyz
2021-09-27  0:53 ` Nico Schottelius
2021-09-27  7:11   ` Bruno Wolff III
2021-09-27  7:34     ` Roman Mamedov
2021-09-27  9:14       ` Bruno Wolff III
2021-09-27  9:36         ` Roman Mamedov
2021-09-27 10:21           ` Bruno Wolff III [this message]
2021-09-27 13:01             ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-09-27 13:48               ` Lonnie Abelbeck
2021-09-27 15:28             ` StarBrilliant
2021-09-27 15:59               ` Nico Schottelius
2021-09-27 16:37                 ` StarBrilliant
2021-09-27  7:44     ` Nico Schottelius
2021-09-27  8:17       ` Fredrik Strömberg
2021-09-27 16:21 ` Jason A. Donenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210927102157.GA23755@wolff.to \
    --to=bruno@wolff.to \
    --cc=el3xyz@protonmail.com \
    --cc=nico.schottelius@ungleich.ch \
    --cc=rm@romanrm.net \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).