Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tytso@mit.edu, Jason@zx2c4.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, yury.norov@gmail.com,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
	james.smart@broadcom.com, dick.kennedy@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] scsi: lpfc: fix lpfc_cpu_affinity_check() if no further cpus set
Date: Tue,  7 Mar 2023 00:06:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230306160651.2016767-4-vernon2gm@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230306160651.2016767-1-vernon2gm@gmail.com>

After commit 596ff4a09b89 ("cpumask: re-introduce constant-sized cpumask
optimizations"), when NR_CPUS <= BITS_PER_LONG, small_cpumask_bits used
a macro instead of variable-sized for efficient.

If no further cpus set, the cpumask_next() returns small_cpumask_bits,
it must greater than or equal to nr_cpumask_bits, so fix it to correctly.

Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index 61958a24a43d..01c0e2f47cf7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -12563,7 +12563,7 @@ lpfc_cpu_affinity_check(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int vectors)
 					goto found_same;
 				new_cpu = cpumask_next(
 					new_cpu, cpu_present_mask);
-				if (new_cpu == nr_cpumask_bits)
+				if (new_cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
 					new_cpu = first_cpu;
 			}
 			/* At this point, we leave the CPU as unassigned */
@@ -12577,7 +12577,7 @@ lpfc_cpu_affinity_check(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int vectors)
 			 * selecting the same IRQ.
 			 */
 			start_cpu = cpumask_next(new_cpu, cpu_present_mask);
-			if (start_cpu == nr_cpumask_bits)
+			if (start_cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
 				start_cpu = first_cpu;
 
 			lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_INFO, LOG_INIT,
@@ -12613,7 +12613,7 @@ lpfc_cpu_affinity_check(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int vectors)
 					goto found_any;
 				new_cpu = cpumask_next(
 					new_cpu, cpu_present_mask);
-				if (new_cpu == nr_cpumask_bits)
+				if (new_cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
 					new_cpu = first_cpu;
 			}
 			/* We should never leave an entry unassigned */
@@ -12631,7 +12631,7 @@ lpfc_cpu_affinity_check(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int vectors)
 			 * selecting the same IRQ.
 			 */
 			start_cpu = cpumask_next(new_cpu, cpu_present_mask);
-			if (start_cpu == nr_cpumask_bits)
+			if (start_cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
 				start_cpu = first_cpu;
 
 			lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_INFO, LOG_INIT,
@@ -12704,7 +12704,7 @@ lpfc_cpu_affinity_check(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int vectors)
 				goto found_hdwq;
 			}
 			new_cpu = cpumask_next(new_cpu, cpu_present_mask);
-			if (new_cpu == nr_cpumask_bits)
+			if (new_cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
 				new_cpu = first_cpu;
 		}
 
@@ -12719,7 +12719,7 @@ lpfc_cpu_affinity_check(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int vectors)
 				goto found_hdwq;
 
 			new_cpu = cpumask_next(new_cpu, cpu_present_mask);
-			if (new_cpu == nr_cpumask_bits)
+			if (new_cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
 				new_cpu = first_cpu;
 		}
 
@@ -12730,7 +12730,7 @@ lpfc_cpu_affinity_check(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int vectors)
  found_hdwq:
 		/* We found an available entry, copy the IRQ info */
 		start_cpu = cpumask_next(new_cpu, cpu_present_mask);
-		if (start_cpu == nr_cpumask_bits)
+		if (start_cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
 			start_cpu = first_cpu;
 		cpup->hdwq = new_cpup->hdwq;
  logit:
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-06 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-06 16:06 [PATCH 0/5] fix call cpumask_next() " Vernon Yang
2023-03-06 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] random: fix try_to_generate_entropy() " Vernon Yang
2023-03-06 16:26   ` Yury Norov
2023-03-06 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/5] wireguard: fix wg_cpumask_choose_online() " Vernon Yang
2023-03-06 16:06 ` Vernon Yang [this message]
2023-03-06 18:48   ` [PATCH 3/5] scsi: lpfc: fix lpfc_cpu_affinity_check() " Linus Torvalds
2023-03-06 20:09     ` Vernon Yang
2023-03-06 16:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] scsi: lpfc: fix lpfc_nvmet_setup_io_context() " Vernon Yang
2023-03-06 16:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] cpumask: fix comment of cpumask_xxx Vernon Yang
2023-03-06 16:39   ` Yury Norov
2023-03-06 16:44     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2023-03-06 16:54       ` Yury Norov
2023-03-06 17:04         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2023-03-06 17:45     ` Vernon Yang
2023-03-06 17:29   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-03-06 17:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-03-06 18:02       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-03-06 18:13     ` Vernon Yang
2023-03-06 18:34       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230306160651.2016767-4-vernon2gm@gmail.com \
    --to=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dick.kennedy@broadcom.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).