From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECAF4C6FD1E for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 23:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id aa6eefba; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 23:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id a059ddc3 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 16:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id me6-20020a17090b17c600b0023816b0c7ceso13644451pjb.2 for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 08:07:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678118843; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5DGQdrsotz8W8EizOYEyX2DBff0cLsAl7IvbnLHf+bg=; b=nXoibcR7ByMCQICFh5RhNYtLXdctMhTA+mzKcFRnYoLe927/eL+h0tzDLTd0dnKoT0 Z3z05jUPKUt4emgJ2q/iGj/eZsyitdS6TXa8ihVDkWpV5/onJknq0FNf2pphCFSu+Hui bfptA7x0gTIXK959Q7/8biA0Vay9WSDh5KGaN/pBGNJ4AwT+lqKhbtwJOumDaShaudGH eK3XnWbpdhfZ94ConuZv+3ifSNIUkwJtJW+K4hV2030YfNY2qXypG3VI4bApQIEQmMeI +blufCszN17pGg/ZQbNZPcgOJn42gOhr8krF48cXhsPkmWGitk3GARXgsrXa8ghyVQzo cI4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678118843; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5DGQdrsotz8W8EizOYEyX2DBff0cLsAl7IvbnLHf+bg=; b=CStFk+So63cJx+L0+5z4wKmpOBd+IFAsTiDiJ5YHrFrA3OBNEyYs2VoLCJ6L5AGPRI NZpsF250o8WvyryKX+N9/Sxh+cfSYKNoRWJkn1f565fJTXr4mR6TdyZEjo4Cy32mu2Ov rzvkBztuisuTz9KEOBtTOE+f9ha3MsIkcXItQhyZpYtZ4nNUIIz0bXaPQgOmbKe4d95+ h/Z0u5Te5hqYxB5lC5yuT12o8vbL66JXxF3zvUohDahxX16oKC85zS72hqhJgj2/OAmI SFo2Soj+LqNMl5zYKkT+oU6uSdgvAlWfKP2VuI89sRnAPT8vU95uH7ZysUZhqG6YR2XY Gj1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKU3WeTRL02+RttW3l8c0VJw5zIF5ox4y7bNceQVyxOvOSP5ot3p 0ZWrd4ZvOSSxyF8PI3xYbBg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/tMWsOQQEdPjLWbhhz2SNcZHDm9AMA47AGQ9t0MP6KYTtdnCDlPd0/4DIKsgVEc6b4smPKLA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:a10b:b0:c7:1da3:e3a with SMTP id q11-20020a056a20a10b00b000c71da30e3amr13357543pzk.16.1678118842755; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 08:07:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from vernon-pc.. ([49.67.2.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u6-20020aa78386000000b005d35695a66csm6465318pfm.137.2023.03.06.08.07.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Mar 2023 08:07:22 -0800 (PST) From: Vernon Yang To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tytso@mit.edu, Jason@zx2c4.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, yury.norov@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, james.smart@broadcom.com, dick.kennedy@broadcom.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Vernon Yang Subject: [PATCH 4/5] scsi: lpfc: fix lpfc_nvmet_setup_io_context() if no further cpus set Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 00:06:50 +0800 Message-Id: <20230306160651.2016767-5-vernon2gm@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230306160651.2016767-1-vernon2gm@gmail.com> References: <20230306160651.2016767-1-vernon2gm@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 23:06:36 +0000 X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" After commit 596ff4a09b89 ("cpumask: re-introduce constant-sized cpumask optimizations"), when NR_CPUS <= BITS_PER_LONG, small_cpumask_bits used a macro instead of variable-sized for efficient. If no further cpus set, the cpumask_next() returns small_cpumask_bits, it must greater than or equal to nr_cpumask_bits, so fix it to correctly. Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c index 7517dd55fe91..3ae7f330f827 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c @@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ lpfc_nvmet_setup_io_context(struct lpfc_hba *phba) continue; } cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_present_mask); - if (cpu == nr_cpu_ids) + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_present_mask); } -- 2.34.1