From: "Daniel Gröber" <dxld@darkboxed.org>
To: labawi-wg@matrix-dream.net
Cc: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Replace WireGuard AllowedIPs with IP route attribute
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 15:12:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230929131257.4uyp3fkxkxt7qg3f@darkboxed.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPP7tab5OqR39RcY@matrix-dream.net>
Hi Ivan,
> IMO, a good tunnel solution may be if what is now called AllowedIPs,
> were functionally split into:
> - AcceptIPS (to be different from AllowedIPs)
> - RouteIPs
> Perhaps with a default shorthand of, say, IPs, setting both, as
> AllowedIPs historically caused confusion wrt. it's meaning.
That would be one way to paint the shed, yes.
This alone doesn't really address the crux of the problem though:
scalability.
> Wireguard API is a bit clunky, but I think one could dynamically manage
> routes in reasonably efficient ways without extra interfaces and layers.
The entire idea with the new route attribute is to put this functionality
into the right (pre-existing) layer and not invent a new way of expressing
this. We even get scalability for free. Win-Win.
--Daniel
PS: Your mail didn't reach my inbox for some reason, I randomly found it
while looking at the wg list archives. Consider configuring your mail
client to To/CC people you're replying to in order to better handle flaky
list servers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-29 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-19 14:02 Daniel Gröber
[not found] ` <5112ea1f-0f67-4907-a3c5-b6c7b9e591ca@kr217.de>
2023-08-19 18:17 ` Daniel Gröber
2023-08-19 20:00 ` [Babel-users] " Steffen Vogel
2023-08-19 21:23 ` Daniel Gröber
2023-08-28 15:40 ` Kyle Rose
2023-08-28 16:07 ` Daniel Gröber
2023-08-28 17:40 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2023-08-28 17:55 ` Kyle Rose
2023-08-28 22:13 ` Daniel Gröber
2023-09-03 3:21 ` Ivan Labáth
2023-09-29 13:12 ` Daniel Gröber [this message]
2023-09-29 16:19 ` Reto
[not found] ` <804a0c0a-78df-7f4c-1d0d-213e8bdb4120@nic.cz>
2023-11-09 11:57 ` [Babel-users] " Alexander Zubkov
2023-11-18 2:19 ` Daniel Gröber
[not found] ` <918e1d5b-9f11-4f9c-bf9a-94cb0d41ce2b@app.fastmail.com>
2023-11-18 12:22 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2023-11-20 2:05 ` Daniel Gröber
[not found] ` <CABr+u0b6vrZoYzQcMiCXX7W0XsQRNMzQfZnT5cK1MQoZ4NoqkA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-11-22 7:39 ` Daniel Gröber
2023-08-19 20:05 ` Kyle Rose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230929131257.4uyp3fkxkxt7qg3f@darkboxed.org \
--to=dxld@darkboxed.org \
--cc=labawi-wg@matrix-dream.net \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).