From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60175C433F5 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id af3a990a; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.onetrix.net (eleanor.onetrix.net [86.59.13.171]) by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPS id d11e310f (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:27:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chil.at; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID; bh=TjIhDD45HwLDGFHK4S9zOIRkN0qRdMgiYw+FsCe2OWM=; b=0AK7rtYpFSnxkil9rC2FSvHBkV0ceUQl+vPm0+ECe6NOB9vdt4g9bqwP540drro533Tu73MGawgonQzBmRheEYaE++N+zzlbu76wnFYqgaVXWF8Aaf8DZC2VRhEKa/1BZ8H6vWAXvDGH085p5bV272fHiydZ0yHse7IbyENSmzM=; Received: from [10.5.44.225] (port=47588 helo=mail.onetrix.net) by mail.onetrix.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1mpVpV-0008LT-1k for wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:27:25 +0100 Received: from [172.22.0.123] (193.238.156.229) by mail.onetrix.net (10.5.44.225) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.438.0; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:27:24 +0100 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A682F1A.619CEC3D.004D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 Message-ID: <20c5ff86-be75-b9e2-8dda-0dc5b0ec8f17@chil.at> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:27:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wireguard-tools: contrib/reresolve-dns script for Windows Powershell Content-Language: de-AT To: References: <68de8cb8-81ce-1f51-22fd-9ef20b24f693@online.de> From: Christoph Loesch In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [193.238.156.229] X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi, Am 23.11.2021 um 11:14 schrieb Max Schulze: > NB: Why the limit to 15 chars in the Interface name? Mine had more, thus setting the arbitrary (?) limit to 18 chars. as Aaron Jones pointed out in my thread "Android app: length of name": on Linux, the length of an interface name (e.g. "eth0") is limited to 15 characters Kind regards, Christoph