From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 290F1C433FE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 22:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bac2933f; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 22:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from srv.inf7.email (srv.inf7.email [64.225.52.57]) by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPS id b2e00e95 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 22:56:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=solidadmin.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=T3omJn8Xcr6dK+XQq5veh4XLsuXrbqTTHJKTqqLuC3w=; b=AwjbUscxqPE9k9bsANMRlzKfs8 bIjT5B+WS+wWgESi2paFG8auKYFW/Xz9qFUut/Do6sfaPeyP6lugfOuSm+xk8H0XeLWT5zWu0VlH0 x2T4UHYQJKOcV7Y9HhVl3sRbDE+jDxkJ/LMugqijUQpGnLglceVqt5es8+bmVWzEzT2rPDIYh1Q4X 2v8wDGXMqSjG4TqST5B/b0UvhF9QcPWDmXfl6ADLpzivDxzsnVWN1/oXbAxV/fsRivVNdlAD4zuiI qDP7GspB87Qv4X7VkDoZ6fIAJS4CxGgRpfAvjoyP2NtNof7W/od/9rIKkYSv9S/vwHyyN2X5mF3zp rz8CJWnQ==; Received: from c-71-201-101-213.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([71.201.101.213]:47162 helo=[192.168.1.242]) by srv.inf7.email with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nbVcX-004eXK-SO for wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 22:56:25 +0000 Message-ID: <22f7069e-fac3-09e8-5f2e-2d3c93506352@solidadmin.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 17:56:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: wireguard performance Content-Language: en-US To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com References: From: Joe Doss Organization: SolidAdmin In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - srv.inf7.email X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.zx2c4.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solidadmin.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: srv.inf7.email: authenticated_id: jdoss@solidadmin.com X-Authenticated-Sender: srv.inf7.email: jdoss@solidadmin.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On 4/4/22 4:34 PM, Devanath S wrote: > We were trying to test the performance of wireguard on GCP and found > it around 1G for TCP and around 500-800 for UDP. > > Plz do let us know if there are any ways to UP this performance. Any > suggestion is appreciated. GCP network defaults to a lower MTU (1460). You might want to adjust your WireGuard tunnel's MTUs and the default GCP VPC MTU. See: https://cloud.google.com/network-connectivity/docs/vpn/concepts/mtu-considerations Joe -- Joe Doss joe@solidadmin.com