Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Schulze <>
To: Szymon Nowak <>
Subject: Re: wireguard-windows: possibly wrong selection of outgoing IP Address?
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:43:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Hallo Szymon,

On 07.06.22 09:08, Szymon Nowak wrote:
> Hi To do this on the windows server, you need to run NAT on the WG interface

why should I ? Which interfaces should I bridge? The WG Interface is "stand-alone" and does not to any routing to/from public internet for any clients.

Why are you suggesting NAT, when the log shows that the IP adresses for the *destination* are correct?

Besides, I do not need to do any of this on the linux box, where the connection is successful with the same config.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-06-07  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-05 20:21 Max Schulze
2022-06-07  7:08 ` Szymon Nowak
2022-06-07  8:43   ` Max Schulze [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: wireguard-windows: possibly wrong selection of outgoing IP Address?' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).