From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07DFC433F5 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b20f4b03; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.pineview.net (mail.pineview.net [203.33.246.11]) by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPS id 6abf4397 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [203.33.246.51] (airtime.pineview.net [203.33.246.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pineview.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9ABEB800CC; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:34:21 +1030 (ACDT) Message-ID: <3171350c-543d-92c9-c897-3cb752a811cf@pineview.net> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:34:20 +1030 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: Dynamic routes Content-Language: en-US To: Chriztoffer Hansen , Robert.Dahlem@gmx.net Cc: "WireGuard List (wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com)" References: <3c70475b-64e5-acf7-819c-94f721fed8b6@gmx.net> From: Mike O'Connor In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On 24/11/21 9:48 pm, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 18:20, Robert Dahlem wrote: >> I could always install Quagga or Bird and use OSPF. But that might be a >> bit of an overkill for a simple active/passive failover. > RIP, OSPF, BGP, EIGRP. Either can work. And would IMO be sufficiently > simple to set up and maintain. Either way, you will need a daemon to > maintain monitoring of the packets being able to flow over the tunnel. > If you select a routing demon or another daemon. ... take a pick. > Correct, not the job of Wireguard. Cheers Mike