From: Mike O'Connor <mike@pineview.net>
To: Daniel <tech@tootai.net>, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: [Warning: DMARC Fail Email] Re: ipv6 connexion fail - ipv4 OK
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:05:45 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34d4341c-98be-b754-af8e-c7097bc21aac@pineview.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ec547c6-c846-e5be-e276-ace7862f5cb7@tootai.net>
Hi
On a 1500 link I'm having to use 1280 to get ipv6 to successfully go
over a wireguard link.
I really think wireguard should be able to fragment and send via
multiply UDP packets.
wireguard works very well other than this issue, performance is
extremely good.
Mike
On 28/8/21 2:46 am, Daniel wrote:
> Hi ROman
>
> Le 27/08/2021 à 18:14, Roman Mamedov a écrit :
>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:14:00 +0200
>> Daniel <tech@tootai.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Correction
>>>
>>> Le 25/08/2021 à 17:25, Daniel a écrit :
>>>> Hi list,
>>>>
>>>> I setup wireguard on a server running Debian 11 and get it to work
>>>> with
>>>> 2 clients (Debian 11 and Ubuntu 20.04). Clients and server are on
>>>> separate networks, one client behind a FW the other direct on
>>>> Internet,
>>>> no FW at all (VPS).
>>>>
>>>> With this setup and ipv4 connection to the public IP of the server,
>>>> everything is working as expected, ipv4 as well as ipv6 are passing
>>>> smoothly.
>>>>
>>>> Now I want to connect using the ipv6 address of the wg interface as
>>>> both
>>>> clients and server have ULA ipv6.
>>> Here is GUA to read.
>>>
>>>> This fail, wg show that connection is
>>>> established but VPN is not usable. It's not a FW problem as I can
>>>> ssh to
>>>> the ipv6 address, as well as a netcat test from/to server IP -from
>>>> each
>>>> client- on an UDP port is working properly. Also,
>>>> net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1 is activated in sysctl.conf
>>>>
>>>> All network stuff is done in /etc/network/interfaces which call the
>>>> config file. The ipv6 address of the server is affected _to the
>>>> wireguard interface_ (in ipv4 it's another interface who take care of
>>>> the public address)
>>>>
>>>> Server version is wireguard-tools v1.0.20210223.
>>>>
>>>> If someone have any hint, thanks to share ;)
>> IPv6 requires the in-WG MTU to be 20 bytes less than when running
>> over IPv4.
>> Try reducing it accordingly.
>
> Tried 1400, 1396 and 1392, problem stay.
>
> Thanks for your help
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-27 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-25 15:25 Daniel
2021-08-26 11:14 ` Daniel
2021-08-27 16:14 ` Roman Mamedov
2021-08-27 17:16 ` Daniel
2021-08-27 21:35 ` Mike O'Connor [this message]
2021-08-27 21:44 ` [Warning: DMARC Fail Email] " Roman Mamedov
2021-08-27 21:54 ` Mike O'Connor
2021-08-30 10:24 ` Daniel
2021-08-30 12:55 ` Skyler Mäntysaari
2021-08-30 16:43 ` Roman Mamedov
2021-08-30 17:28 ` Daniel
2021-08-30 17:38 ` Roman Mamedov
2021-08-30 17:44 ` Daniel
2021-08-30 17:59 ` Roman Mamedov
2021-08-31 17:50 ` Daniel
2021-09-01 17:44 ` Daniel
2021-09-03 13:59 ` ipv6 connexion fail - ipv4 OK (SOLVED) Daniel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34d4341c-98be-b754-af8e-c7097bc21aac@pineview.net \
--to=mike@pineview.net \
--cc=tech@tootai.net \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).