From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: mail@danrl.com Received: from mx.sealand.io (mx.sealand.io [193.160.39.68]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 7b58476f for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dan_L=C3=BCdtke?= In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:38:05 +0100 Message-Id: <44DAF4D4-00A8-4903-8003-EB0215635B61@danrl.com> References: To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: WireGuard mailing list Subject: Re: [WireGuard] Demo Server: Dual stack? List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Jason, > I guess I could provide IPv6 connectivity, but.... why? It's a demo. Because it is a demo of a brand new protocol, showing how it can be used = with legacy versions payload and transport protocol. I find that odd, = but as I understand we have contradicting point of views on IP = protocols. > If you're using it as an access point to the Internet with intentions > beyond simply trying out WireGuard, then you're abusing my service. I am not using it at all. But it would be useful for howtos and blog = posts to reference it. I don't use vintage IP in my posts, so I can't = refer to the official demo server. Since many potential peers are behind NATs using RFC1918 legacy IP = addresses AND have global unicast IP addresses (which are easier to = whitelist in a firewall than maintaining port forwarding in networks = using a dynamic configuration protocol) I expect WireGuard to be = especially useful using IPv6 as transport. BTW, I don't see any reason why the demo server should forward to the = Internet at all. Connectivity between peers/server and accessing the = hidden website would be enough for my usecase (howtos/blog posts), which = may be a different one than what you intended when you setup the server.=20= > I'm happy to consider this, but I'll need to be convinced that this > actually matters. Unfortunately :) I, for one, need to be convinced why I should create = lasting documentation using an EOL IP protocol. Why does IPv4 matter = more than IPv6? Usually, latency is better when using IPv6. Latency is = probably the first thing demo users test (ping through the tunnel). However, if you like to share some information how to set up one myself, = I am happy to host a IPv6 demo server. Currently I am wondering how to = accept *any* public key in the [Peer] config. Cheers, Dan > Jason >=20 > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Dan L=C3=BCdtke = wrote: >> Jason, >>=20 >> do you plan on adding IPv6 compatibility to the demo server? If not, = do you mind if I set one up? How difficult is it to run the demo server. = It just accepts every key, right? >>=20 >> Cheers, >>=20 >> Dan >> _______________________________________________ >> WireGuard mailing list >> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com >> http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard