From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D898DC433DB for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD19B22BF5 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:43:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BD19B22BF5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=westermo.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 3a0617b0; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx08-0057a101.pphosted.com (mx08-0057a101.pphosted.com [185.183.31.45]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id 89ba7123 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0214196.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-0057a101.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 0BL8hkix031675; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 09:43:46 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=westermo.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=12052020; bh=+o9dSgiE/AJ+RY2MqrI9+GsWYteTzVjnBWE07fNWcks=; b=ybuE4G61fVTg5L6yZZl6H9v5UXRqRG5PZpKDEBjmdLUeSOH+XtTpM5PcwVXMNglZNK+K ugauvvkm/JhC6SLkTcXCYEEgnEQF73S5xD0J/0z71Co6De9bC3ZwArwyXFklWM7zNeb+ 3wyu97hQEpd6EwzeEGlEpjL62YuFhYHdqiPsBNTvRWv36vWUauM5cMI8Yi05xKqdEr8f f2AsSV67zphrulI7QHQ9yJza0+av276v7MRXee0qCo4EcnlgAxa4jo6tFN99oSIKTiyX 4aMVOkgAaOEac8uBRrktWM5P5apQJLBZvGi4uCc2YQLt0MFiQWrpBfzzwolwpOXlqDnH bg== Received: from mail.beijerelectronics.com ([195.67.87.131]) by mx07-0057a101.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 35h6d8spf9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 09:43:45 +0100 Received: from wsests-s0004.westermo.com (192.168.10.12) by EX01GLOBAL.beijerelectronics.com (10.101.10.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1847.3; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 09:42:06 +0100 Received: from [172.29.101.174] (172.29.101.174) by wsests-s0004.westermo.com (192.168.10.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1847.3; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 09:42:06 +0100 Subject: Re: Default route on windows To: Ronan Lucio CC: WireGuard mailing list References: <75011a3f-c143-d88e-c5c9-b13fd5999e3e@westermo.com> From: Matthias May Message-ID: <4754a1ea-bc52-f96d-8b1e-2969fb108f85@westermo.com> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 09:42:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.29.101.174] X-ClientProxiedBy: wsests-s0004.westermo.com (192.168.10.12) To wsests-s0004.westermo.com (192.168.10.12) X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On 20/12/2020 23:54, Ronan Lucio wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > I'm not sure I got your point, but I don't think so. > I'll have to do some additional tests and will got back later with > more detailed data. > > Thanks, > Ronan > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:19 AM Matthias May wrote: >> >> On 20/12/2020 19:18, Ronan Lucio wrote: >>> Hi Jason, >>> >>> I did it, but in this case, I got no Internet access >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 1:21 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >>>> >>>> Add 0.0.0.0/0 to your AllowedIPs. >> >> What is your remote end? >> Does it forward your traffic, and NAT it towards the internet? >> >> BR >> Matthias Well my point is, that if your remote end doesn't forward your traffic, you will not have internet access. BR Matthias