From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1203C27C79 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id b4fd55de; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id 293539a0 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42189d3c7efso44656605e9.2 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 05:32:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718627541; x=1719232341; darn=lists.zx2c4.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1o1dlSQQVXm3fTaMaR+tlZ3T0U74blj9oHKevowjOJ8=; b=cLYM336VO20jDVEfEkJdryh3sJZ/5cF3Z+cbQ+d/Alxme78PEAI6NZdDTAV/GEL4v5 gEe1Z7l6p1BoJocdY3VQxw4kkWEtfaHjBkU5X1XN5WCLiCnWxzQ+vG+yGWEm01wa6uw/ jhU89+Z+ND0yrPW7UbK30lcXEs6EY9RnDMZIEHkAcPK0rOSxJLfnCbt7PuWZdiIQBTJT B4f8w26uAQXbGxtJRSL255PE/NxA3WgBv0/PHOAZBMZHI0JSLLAaMU5bhmE1o4/Pg01Y RdMKeaIpjVXinxYndG/V/tIf7jyy1u2aTCjq28OW1pPZIj4PrpD4ry+61bwLv2jFPH5+ ZSXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718627541; x=1719232341; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1o1dlSQQVXm3fTaMaR+tlZ3T0U74blj9oHKevowjOJ8=; b=qYAglslm/zykxsDz1OnzxhprUDG/uliRwpwddaYCD9sQnXNnj+hxyETs+PHB27/CzE ht5FqDadPQS8gPugHYBKkig7rx5PyhLbZAKhhiUsMZmP8YbvUaY2UcxrTeCpryUe8IdL y5rkSulJj7vr4gH09S5rgHLxIoO7pRtqCVtV/Fp5IzgWu/gt4Qjtk5HVnfVuPmjJSD/Z QLGmXtlA0t2FfrbEvaYALfkGs5edKexHuSH6ozwgqndKV2m5lc2vElby6DJL8JAdZs1A qeW/AXO3szp6EfiHE/2pljVZD7NB7wMr+0xKFtYnCeLVSib/2IURdhnjp7X29vn/j3+J LxSw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVJ5Ni5kdOtnRWDi5K9dO7H7MXqOtz7dcjtY810+miMVyfYUjaXb7rs42KycMFr9nXv94ie/j18pNqNc5atbl7F+n53sSLfxkHO X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw7GXjcjd3A3VzMdKusH7gVzY0hjNPi8dpOk+Ram/CfUwvtmxPv nHBBuk916IWOzW2tjtKDFFsZVJ9Iev1z/vOHjvtb4UAfpv2+MlW2 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGzRJdq+S7NCMhwu+BgbdycTDUmQlpxLAVmL5EJvpN9wFbIyo8Dfoc6H1Pia4HZpXqmc3clxg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3589:b0:423:6b7:55de with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42306b75a55mr82010795e9.6.1718627541213; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 05:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.99] (93-48-172-72.ip258.fastwebnet.it. [93.48.172.72]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-422f6320c70sm157548185e9.30.2024.06.17.05.32.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 05:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4940a8fd-6e87-49a4-83e0-8daa69e7a68f@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:32:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Mini PCIE HW accelerator for ChaCha20 To: Antonio Quartulli , WireGuard mailing list References: <78a56a8e-59d2-4948-a761-f1f1b3a6b26a@online.de> <93a15ab0-1cfc-4b39-97fe-64712eafb278@gmail.com> <8f366adc-89a5-4b81-9a4f-8bcb1d08aad3@unstable.cc> Content-Language: en-GB From: Germano Massullo In-Reply-To: <8f366adc-89a5-4b81-9a4f-8bcb1d08aad3@unstable.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Il 17/06/24 13:42, Antonio Quartulli ha scritto: > Hi, > > On 17/06/2024 13:08, Germano Massullo wrote: >> Il 17/06/24 11:45, Antonio Quartulli ha scritto: >>> Have you tried running the test between a client, behind the omnia >>> turris and the wg server? >> >> Do you mean a configuration where the Turris Omnia is not acting as >> Wireguard peer/gateway? I could do it but I prefer not > > No no. Sorry I might have used the wrong words. > > Basically you should keep the wg setup as it is, but instead of > running the iperf client on the turris, you run it on another host > that uses the turris as gateway (as if the turris was the gateway of a > LAN). > > This way the tunnel is still established between the turris and the > server (which is what you want to test), but you move the traffic > generation to a different host (which is most likely what you will > have in a real scenario). > > I hope I clarified your doubt. > > Regards, > > Got it. That configuration will not improve the throughput cause the reason why I started this benchmark is finding out the bottleneck in my configuration, which is very similar to the one you described