Re: openwrt route_allowed_ips is inprecise

["Dan Lüdtke" <mail@danrl.com>]

> On 20 Dec 2016, at 09:52, Dan L=C3=BCdtke <mail@danrl.com> wrote:
>=20
> Regarding the initial preciseness issue, have you tested that on LEDE? =
I can't manage to get duplicate routes. However, outdated testing =
environment. Will rebuild and test again. I can't quite understand what =
the initial issue was. Wouldn't you get a "rtnetlink: file exists" when =
you try to add an route that already exists?

New environment, build from latest sources this morning. Can't =
reproduce. I can't see duplicate routes. Static routes were added via =
LuCI to represent a typical user's approach.

Can we drop this discussion until we can reproduce the problem?

>>=20
>>> Regarding LEDE, netifd should track the routes being added and the =
extra routes do not really do harm.
>>=20
>> Alright then...
>>=20
>> Speaking of netifd, did you ever fix that netifd issue with the IP =
dependency?
>=20
> I am on it. First version did add dependency for both protocols if the =
endpoint name had A and AAAA records. However, I find it cleaner to =
check which endpoint wg chose to use and only add that IP address as an =
depedency. Patch/PR comes when I am satisfied with stability.

https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/3680

This is the leanest approach I came up with and my top candidate for =
merging. Review very welcome.

Thanks!

Dan=