From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC63FC43603 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 17:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350C62053B for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 17:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="bRM+q4WX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 350C62053B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 85607094; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 17:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id aab4ee7f for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id b1d09257 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id 4so3646443pfz.9 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 09:20:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=FhB6UiFBYVKAZFXEqmpWWWYpVagRebRiIVn6oEAmHho=; b=bRM+q4WX1RbcTlHnWOnODPkykJm/bAo0U8Jg5c/eoMal+VHgwQg1tb/9MU+vWI0y4q ZcgkE6osrFTFPtnP7qk7KXyOyIEjvzZ2FTh/O9gAU+MBTNvoZd/9x+skmy/Notc6M6E9 WzLEjxBeiDl2BmtYlRW5XdxsDZC/DObJ5rrCvBol02SyfjwPriXYUQKad5TDjQ496QFB kYLxi78JS5Mm3IyRsCid3PqVR1nBhSv+fbrbblIUpao4Ab076WrwawKhaaiZgFNPdKmr KHhIoW94TuvU5EQOs+/f5hFzohd9z33PKpQ0I6Nyrov6uhNXeyl6J+q7IEa3SR7Cx7Bz xIyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=FhB6UiFBYVKAZFXEqmpWWWYpVagRebRiIVn6oEAmHho=; b=Ket9Qtn+tnAVycWgj+GGkG0VJwuzszFNcBtQbAav+bDIcwNalq+YLO3Qy65M3Q7s0y EKdhGh8vmIMYq4kl/Tar9jPi3CoL5huaUw3/h5LSTSPiyS+SgeKIiJMosoq5nU5EmLI0 h3jPTeN6hgtnPHXGwOadxGDALY1HD/eyobsaB/ixPRbYMezcnw3UXejwPmVNlwE7Yv9u EqNmF+02jgfyitn+1Ot8GOjOFlqOR02L8MwnEDZKBDgBZyCAZRMY2BCaKiNr6olfdljl BnFMX1c3SjUVTSWAbeIbM9lxyR+x+2yIOo4PZ4SRk2BpPHelfSc+DDtyL8rni8rV7eIC 7A9w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVmNXMl2+wZjM920G5d4b+TYcm1MjusJeAvG4ktBNGTfYDVK4be X3aFnaE94IDgpUsIesi44KB4LUMHdZ/gBQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5nrzRK4p+3O5CxPJ7Z4Dkq40osSltVFRBVPTPj8KuN7NX8VhNEaTh16LS4qR4oKDPot6UBA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:968b:: with SMTP id f11mr15816199pfk.209.1575652855393; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 09:20:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [0.0.0.0] ([166.70.207.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r62sm18091782pfc.89.2019.12.06.09.20.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Dec 2019 09:20:55 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Regarding "Inferring and hijacking VPN-tunneled TCP connections" To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" References: <20191205191318.GA44156@zx2c4.com> From: Vasili Pupkin Message-ID: <6e0b3973-7874-275f-a9ec-cb7bf684cc7b@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 20:21:08 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Cc: "William J. Tolley" , WireGuard mailing list X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On 06.12.2019 18:18, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > >> But for the sake of wg-quick >> the filter can be enables for wireguard interface only to be sure it >> wouldn't break anything else > How do you propose this works? That'd require adding -d, right? In > that case we're back to more or less the original rule. If you do it > with -i, then it fails to filter the bad packets that we want to be > filtering. Actually it appears to be harder than I first think The -d option will let broadcast addresses to pass the rule. Is it a problem here? In the original bulletin authors talk about TCP. Testing for interface name doesn't make much sense either, as you said... _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard