From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2E98C433FE for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c32fa8b2; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPS id 8b57383b (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 13:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D6F5C0152 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:14:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap47 ([10.202.2.97]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:14:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; h=cc :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1651151675; x=1651238075; bh=ucqs1OjlbylvKxJvRnntyiwH00uj/sTk91X qmwaWQ8I=; b=pqPzw/ocqYLljJ6ZzEJuqTUAyJ53w47tO4w1FpxtWqd4y6cHeUy 7vOjolabriqgDv8oaur0dOJGS8RlIvJvoC0Z6+XxIcRGBqmC64PpBI19xqEHC0ii lv2ROsEnrFYRkU208sV5g3zkdthoPnROZuWT0HEp7rBmn9Xr+NbVKEnv1PnrgLV8 JUxXgEIFaPoK0+6meXIf/ZNa/LIdouKcWQaytzyhcllPC1ZlpyP8wW/MsmRISypR 7v42y1MMldyoHc6avE2kMLrhuIZ9+2Xzn6otGYaOjVt7iFwnfbKEK2b0Uz5Q5FGm ZfNh5gUzzWb7EXqTxPPwGWUB2jXjvgFQ99A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1651151675; x=1651238075; bh=ucqs1OjlbylvK xJvRnntyiwH00uj/sTk91XqmwaWQ8I=; b=f62T771fZFwcTZ3i6/BSiG50s3ifb 26Jn3kxjEgRV/icxSzZRKTTekRUi6aoeJDike8takPl73bA6TLj4eCuJT4CYXEhU ASRp4sjdpQCVYW3o6+E5jZvRQzPo50VI9n8c9/5BefPtYUr2+IG+J/LBos7IsjMI GtZJxUtebgSw9l8TjD6mAbIc64Y/boU00zGsCNgX4eSnEbedAcK1oxNm/28Y61Xk djYCdGCdH7aZZ5KRuAO4pcaIxUYcIqNrg6ubxFD4kQXeXojeY0xwvbK8LqH/nKiM UdcvUr9di8QI6tJXK/1UXHg/JX5+eKLOvGDnQIyGt4fDYYxv/pP8daY5A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudejgdeifecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkfffhvffutgesthdtredtre ertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrkhcuhfgvlhguvghrfdcuoehfvghlugesfhgvlhgurdhm vgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgeekiedukedvueejhfejgfehffeujeffgfegtdfhff fgudejtdeuleegvddvieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehm rghilhhfrhhomhepfhgvlhgusehfvghlugdrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 80B58A6005D; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:14:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-591-gfe6c3a2700-fm-20220427.001-gfe6c3a27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <80f2d9f4-9917-4e59-87fc-6713e80b1880@www.fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:14:13 -0400 From: "Mark Felder" To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com Subject: [MacOS] DNS search path not working? Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:39:45 +0000 X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hello, I've observed this on MacOS 12 Monterey. I have also tested on iOS 15.4.1 where it works as expected. (I know they share the same codebase). On MacOS I have my DNS configured correctly as DNS = 1.2.3.4, int.foo.com but it doesn't seem to actually work. e.g., if I have a host named server.int.foo.com I cannot just "ping server"; I have to use the FQDN of server.int.foo.com. This behavior works correctly with an OpenVPN connection using the Viscosity software. I have compared the output of scutil --dns and verified that both OpenVPN and Wireguard appear to generate identical DNS configuration. I'm not sure where else to look for differences between what OpenVPN/Viscosity and Wireguard are doing. Any tips? Thanks! Mark -- Mark Felder feld@feld.me