From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BF54C4332F for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 20:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id ac99d5ad; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 20:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.core.gen.tr (ns1.core.gen.tr [50.116.31.210]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id 801ba14f (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 20:56:48 +0000 (UTC) References: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=core.gen.tr; s=mail; t=1667595406; bh=6V8+0ifeDj+v4JvEoWL68Ph9/G/28i2Kto8O08c3SEs=; h=References:From:To:Subject:Date:In-reply-to; b=KjF167aPkSsHpS8AEeiaJjvZGL6K2/yJqu4YgWlPRQH4R37t0psBRzMm8V23iVVgh wQkp0R7SgpE2on0jXDX/NJqz56jLgkrSZmQOm18n+7WHrr4xDE1O9Aw4yHNQjxzFbc qu50gmFxY87bSnrv4iMOlUjK0GhwgtJ4SBq2eSSQ= From: Metin Evrim Ulu To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com Subject: Re: absolutely terrible wireguard performance on a 4ghz box - need tuning help Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 23:55:36 +0300 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <871qqiphfk.fsf@core.gen.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Kyle Sanderson writes: > hi wireguard, > > APU2C4 - AMD Embedded G series GX-412TC, 1 GHz quad Jaguar core with > 64 bit and AES-NI support > Um, I don't recall any Rijndael/AES in WG implementation, any particular reason for mentioning AES-NI? best, evrim.