Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: James Wilson <ehdot795@gmail.com>, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: Encapsulation
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:38:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871sugpifa.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACCLhZQtterheuB9NF4ppEAYbLKXtsPzCEnMGdtAS5KKVfPEjQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed 2017-03-01 16:38:05 -0800, James Wilson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just out of curiosity, how does a "wireguard packet' look like on the wire
> ??
>
> I'm guessing:
>
>  Ethernet
>  IP
>  UDP
> |------------------|
> | IP               |
> | WG payload       |
> |------------------|
>
>
> What's in the box is encrypted
>
> Is that right ?? If not, what does it look like?

I believe the cleartext (after decryption) is an actual IP packet, so
everything from layer3 up the stack.


If anyone wants to document this sort of thing explicitly in a useful
way, you might consider writing a wireshark dissector:

  https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChDissectAdd.html

and you can clone wireshark's source with:

   git clone https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark

The simplest thing would be to start with a dissector for the ciphertext
itself, for the few pieces of metadata that are outside the encrypted
packet (see e.g. §5.4.2 of
https://www.wireguard.io/papers/wireguard.pdf)

If you want to get more clever, you could add a mechanism to the
wireguard module to extract session keys, and then make a decryptor
plugin to wireshark. But start with just the ciphertext ;)

      --dkg

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-02  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-02  0:38 Encapsulation James Wilson
2017-03-02  1:09 ` Encapsulation Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-03-02  1:38 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor [this message]
2017-03-02 13:37   ` Encapsulation James Wilson
2017-03-02 15:19     ` Encapsulation Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-03-02 16:58   ` Encapsulation Peter Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871sugpifa.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net \
    --to=dkg@fifthhorseman.net \
    --cc=ehdot795@gmail.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).