From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: saschagrunert@icloud.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id be6ca809 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p00im-asmtp004.me.com (st11p00im-asmtp004.me.com [17.172.80.98]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id acec09e7 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from process-dkim-sign-daemon.st11p00im-asmtp004.me.com by st11p00im-asmtp004.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.38.0 64bit (built Feb 26 2016)) id <0OMT00M00GPWXX00@st11p00im-asmtp004.me.com> for wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:50:00 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:49:28 +0100 From: Sascha Grunert To: sopium Message-id: <8726b4ef-f654-4be5-8025-865a55187c77@Spark> In-reply-to: <15acda6e9bc.b852f6478142.4195445703657110954@mysterious.site> References: <15acda6e9bc.b852f6478142.4195445703657110954@mysterious.site> Subject: Re: Rust implementation status MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=58c83b4e_6b8b4567_103 Cc: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --58c83b4e_6b8b4567_103 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hey guys, I would really like to do that. =46or the main development I would throw = this into discussion: https://github.com/WireGuard/wireguard-rs/issues/1=23= issuecomment-286521908 I guess it would be more visible to the Rust community if we allow mainta= ining it via the GitHub repository. =40Jason, what do you think=3F Best regards, Sascha Am 14. M=C3=A4rz 2017, 17:29 +0100 schrieb sopium : > Hi Sascha and folks, > > ---- On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 20:42:00 +0900 Sascha Grunert wrote ---- > > Hey folks, > > > > I want to call for participation of the Rust userspace implementation= of WireGuard. The template for the initial implementation was this: http= s://www.wireguard.io/xplatform/ and can be found here: https://git.zx2c4.= com/wireguard-rs/. > > > > What works for now: > > > > - A main working executable (=60cargo run -- -h=60) which parses the = command line parameters via the =60clap=60 crate > > - General debug and tracing support via the =60log=60 crate > > - Daemonizing support > > - The wireguard library which creates a local socket and waits for in= coming connections (reference implementation) > > > > =5B...=5D > > I have kept an eye on this. It seems that you were mostly working > on the =60xplatform=60 stuff, and haven't started on the actual > implementation of the protocol yet. My code has (partly) > implemented the protocol, but lacks the =60xplatform=60 ui. So it > seems like a perfect time to merge efforts. What do you think=3F > > And to all who are interested in userspace WG impls, in > particular Rust impls, I have adjusted the goal of my project to > =E2=80=9Cto write a secure, compatible, cross-platform and reasonably > fast user-space implementation of WireGuard in Rust=E2=80=9D. I am also= > committed to finishing and maintaining it. There is a big TODO > list, and contribution is welcome=21 > > =46or those not closely following this thread, the project is at: > > https://github.com/sopium/titun/tree/wg > > Regards, > Sopium > > --58c83b4e_6b8b4567_103 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Hey guys,

I would really like to do that. =46or the main development I would throw = this into discussion: https://github.com/WireGuard/wireguard-rs/issues/1=23= issuecomment-286521908

I guess it would be more visible to the Rust community if we allow mainta= ining it via the GitHub repository.

=40Jason, what do you think=3F

Best regards,
Sascha

Am 14. M=C3=A4rz 2017, 17:29 +0100 schrieb sopium <sopium=40mysterious= .site>:
Hi Sascha and folks,

---- On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 20:42:00 +0900 Sascha Grunert <saschagrunert=40= icloud.com> wrote ----
Hey folks,

I want to call for participation of the Rust userspace implementation of = WireGuard. The template for the initial implementation was this: https://= www.wireguard.io/xplatform/ and can be found here: https://git.zx2c4.com/= wireguard-rs/.

What works for now:

- A main working executable (=60cargo run -- -h=60) which parses the comm= and line parameters via the =60clap=60 crate
- General debug and tracing support via the =60log=60 crate
- Daemonizing support
- The wireguard library which creates a local socket and waits for incomi= ng connections (reference implementation)

=5B...=5D

I have kept an eye on this. It seems that you were mostly working
on the =60xplatform=60 stuff, and haven't started on the actual
implementation of the protocol yet. My code has (partly)
implemented the protocol, but lacks the =60xplatform=60 ui. So it
seems like a perfect time to merge efforts. What do you think=3F

And to all who are interested in userspace WG impls, in
particular Rust impls, I have adjusted the goal of my project to
=E2=80=9Cto write a secure, compatible, cross-platform and reasonably
fast user-space implementation of WireGuard in Rust=E2=80=9D. I am also committed to finishing and maintaining it. There is a big TODO
list, and contribution is welcome=21

=46or those not closely following this thread, the project is at:

https://github.com/sopium/titun/tree/wg

Regards,
Sopium


--58c83b4e_6b8b4567_103--