On Wed 2017-01-04 13:50:14 -0500, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey Christian, Daniel, Dan, and other maintainers,
>
> The next snapshot is going to have some improvements to the tooling,
> and along with this comes a more complicated Makefile. I wanted to run
> the changes by y'all (downstreams).
>
> - The makefile now has a few WITH_{FEATURE}=yes|no environment flags,
> as well as auto-detection. Documentation is here:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/plain/src/tools/INSTALL
> And the Makefile itself is here:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/tree/src/tools/Makefile
>
> Question: does this propose a desirable situation for you as a downstream?

Reading through INSTALL, these parameters look reasonable to me as a
downstream.

> - The wg-config script is now called wg-quick and is quite simple and
> nice. Documentation:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/about/src/tools/wg-quick.8
> And source:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/tree/src/tools/wg-quick.bash
>
> OpenWRT should _not_ ship this. NixOS probably should not ship this.
> When systemd-networkd gets support for WireGuard, systemd-based
> distros should not ship this. But everybody else who just wants a
> simple rough script for quickly bringing up and down VPNs can ship
> this, as it's a big help to users. It's installed according to the
> documentation for the Makefile above.

this also looks good.

> - There's now an "upstream" systemd unit for wg-quick, called
> wg-quick@.service. It's pretty simple:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/tree/src/tools/wg-quick@.service
>
> Question: does this unit seem sane to you? Can you ship it downstream
> as is, or will you need modifications?

although i haven't tested it, a quick read through the .service file
looks reasonable to me.  Thanks for thinking about system integration
stuff.

        --dkg